Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp4950375iog; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:54:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1u1EQH3CfLZWOnpgUVXxdapDkdcafvxaUid9ffSHsY9UbNh2Me/8veTKOsqkx2gUp36bmYe X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c193:b0:718:d076:df7 with SMTP id g19-20020a170906c19300b00718d0760df7mr3873057ejz.358.1655913274282; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:54:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655913274; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ribOBGmpUvwgHQdfmXKEk4E41k2HoLKiFCaUU9Ec30YOr4tDwhWZH7d5WJOXQ5Qzh5 drSC6Y3zZPBVxBbt0J7kOmVOzQ+ruk6PTd/dBGIBn/M9a4moHD72KntWGG7+HPHKyMjc Du+rbQqg5z2CClARQQj8xixWLdq4Zl2Dc9NlLh9t29huptH1GiitPj1fKXGr6R/phS9k dU2zRWjU4YrZRiMJnwsY51mDfH58kLV7mQSKG/X+eA2AEhTDJ+h1PSUBjNCAuGTkw5RR FAJ6vIez77Lve2yXGbMoZJRAlUoNsIiAvD9QyLWG0o7sGrwxjKZDKbbeNEjBIZCRLdah 99OQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=fL0cpK7LWs+wtjTpXEysTDKhA1+C2iKr938rtJlnymk=; b=r9m6X5hX6EqCFfo9VV8zGGealyCetqV9kxAXZOhkTse0oB9ciRChqjlDzzL9/pPCHm +mLf++IVqSbqZmWsflobvWKXSZHLoL4zNJqnS8fTbvK+zcli2QS6ghKjkQ3pgRR9P5hc dTcZjjMziP1Ve/TFvMJPA8nVQErIdNYuPenHPwXxF57ycwWZ5MtpKqJKuvru0MaQaw5c qsdnqi0h0/FlFdM15jZPaJ9jrK61ZvdjydqJwBzVKK9uvGl0TMmSWIEEEALzWjIO2aXz 7TxaPlxJLjR2XiCAclP0bfkUEHvr3CpngDmOmcRwh/jIxzamJ4ovnFTif8i6ndkQSPxY N2wQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=GvfsdTBm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hg4-20020a1709072cc400b006f392f11feasi19331133ejc.20.2022.06.22.08.54.08; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=GvfsdTBm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1359228AbiFVPTx (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1358543AbiFVPTv (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:19:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F204037A18 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id g25so34931583ejh.9 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:19:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fL0cpK7LWs+wtjTpXEysTDKhA1+C2iKr938rtJlnymk=; b=GvfsdTBmWyUjk9gg9yIDNOY9pWXwZpSazxMnvIHYUTAT4sO4mm4iC+WrG83ULgLwBi QtBCMGf25OQ+7Ho+NdkvZzvhBdy0akfEaA68slA7C5N5ZDC46Rfqh50C/YZ9XO/vmVqA 3eV5iTj/g8q0Qp6DxxUqZdHPySmTSs8jND17Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fL0cpK7LWs+wtjTpXEysTDKhA1+C2iKr938rtJlnymk=; b=URf6pwXbq43B2B7kc25N4oabjAEv6Ja03gJHqt6czAO98DTmAhBg90hXYyHU4/Oak7 JF/5ry7Rl2H9oQJNewTi5iLgWoMQi4lWA1FxPWS9wo/b5yDuji+k1jQBu86zb9k8iQXO KxQSIlkBD6nBj43EdH4UaLS0Qeekd5Lh5iLMHQiDDl7LoruTn0tJ+Y4s0k1xiRgACCcu IHrU2sdv7WUg01FpErsLFIzp6ngAVBcOYJYeFwVMHFrjCAKv5U+wPEA1MZ5jAUEoa4h6 Kk/UWORzKV34gTfaoP2Q3gkLxz3TzcG6iqe6QdX+dr4yc/NDGiVueh/xzeJ3DvoNm1qu Hffw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8AMumWmeofvS37PoHZUe3KH7waezBFju55X7Weit8oL9DWx/Xo tDggLiMCgv4x62pP2E2uXnvYGx3xTNH/V96O X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce:b0:715:705e:52fb with SMTP id 14-20020a17090600ce00b00715705e52fbmr3562711eji.303.1655911189246; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com. [209.85.221.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h7-20020a0564020e8700b004355dc75066sm12916446eda.86.2022.06.22.08.19.48 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id v14so23906429wra.5 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:19:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:48c1:0:b0:21a:3574:e70c with SMTP id p1-20020a5d48c1000000b0021a3574e70cmr3769039wrs.97.1655911187876; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:19:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:19:31 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: mainline build failure due to 281d0c962752 ("fortify: Add Clang support") To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Nathan Chancellor , Kees Cook , Nick Desaulniers , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Netdev , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000224f9505e20ade6b" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_RED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --000000000000224f9505e20ade6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:08 AM Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Yeah, true. I had to check to find out its from the memcpy() in check_image_valid(). Funky but true - I can reproduce it, and just commenting out that memcpy fixes the warning. And I see nothing wrong with that code - it's copying a 'struct fw_section_info_st' between two other structs that seem to have arrays that are appropriately sized. Replacing the memcpy() with just a structure assignment seems to get rid of the warning, and seems to be a simple fix (patch attached), but I don't understand why that memcpy() would warn. This looks like a clang bug to me, but maybe I'm missing something. Linus --000000000000224f9505e20ade6b Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset="US-ASCII"; name="patch.diff" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_l4pqr5ry0 IGRyaXZlcnMvbmV0L2V0aGVybmV0L2h1YXdlaS9oaW5pYy9oaW5pY19kZXZsaW5rLmMgfCA0ICst LS0KIDEgZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkLCAxIGluc2VydGlvbigrKSwgMyBkZWxldGlvbnMoLSkKCmRpZmYg LS1naXQgYS9kcml2ZXJzL25ldC9ldGhlcm5ldC9odWF3ZWkvaGluaWMvaGluaWNfZGV2bGluay5j IGIvZHJpdmVycy9uZXQvZXRoZXJuZXQvaHVhd2VpL2hpbmljL2hpbmljX2RldmxpbmsuYwppbmRl eCA2MGFlOGJmYzVmNjkuLjE3NDlkMjZmNGJlZiAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvZHJpdmVycy9uZXQvZXRo ZXJuZXQvaHVhd2VpL2hpbmljL2hpbmljX2RldmxpbmsuYworKysgYi9kcml2ZXJzL25ldC9ldGhl cm5ldC9odWF3ZWkvaGluaWMvaGluaWNfZGV2bGluay5jCkBAIC00Myw5ICs0Myw3IEBAIHN0YXRp YyBib29sIGNoZWNrX2ltYWdlX3ZhbGlkKHN0cnVjdCBoaW5pY19kZXZsaW5rX3ByaXYgKnByaXYs IGNvbnN0IHU4ICpidWYsCiAKIAlmb3IgKGkgPSAwOyBpIDwgZndfaW1hZ2UtPmZ3X2luZm8uZndf c2VjdGlvbl9jbnQ7IGkrKykgewogCQlsZW4gKz0gZndfaW1hZ2UtPmZ3X3NlY3Rpb25faW5mb1tp XS5md19zZWN0aW9uX2xlbjsKLQkJbWVtY3B5KCZob3N0X2ltYWdlLT5pbWFnZV9zZWN0aW9uX2lu Zm9baV0sCi0JCSAgICAgICAmZndfaW1hZ2UtPmZ3X3NlY3Rpb25faW5mb1tpXSwKLQkJICAgICAg IHNpemVvZihzdHJ1Y3QgZndfc2VjdGlvbl9pbmZvX3N0KSk7CisJCWhvc3RfaW1hZ2UtPmltYWdl X3NlY3Rpb25faW5mb1tpXSA9IGZ3X2ltYWdlLT5md19zZWN0aW9uX2luZm9baV07CiAJfQogCiAJ aWYgKGxlbiAhPSBmd19pbWFnZS0+ZndfbGVuIHx8Cg== --000000000000224f9505e20ade6b--