Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 18:19:46 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To:     Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
        peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
        masahiroy@kernel.org, michal.lkml@markovi.net,
        ndesaulniers@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, broonie@kernel.org,
        rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com,
        christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/33] objtool: add base support for arm64
Message-ID: <20220622171946.mc3cd375fy4fou3b@maple.lan>
References: <20220622154920.95075-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220622154920.95075-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:48:47PM +0800, Chen Zhongjin wrote:
> This series enables objtool to start doing stack validation and orc
> generation on arm64 kernel builds.
> 
> Based on Julien's previous work(1)(2), Now I have finished most of work
> for objtool enable on arm64. This series includes objtool part [1-13]
> and arm64 support part [14-33], the second part is to make objtool run
> correctly with no warning on arm64 so if necessary it can be taken apart
> as two series.
> 
> ORC generation feature is implemented but not used because we don't have
> an unwinder_orc on arm64, now it only be used to check whether objtool
> has correct validation.
> 
> This series depends on (https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/6/22/463)
> I moved some changes which work for all architectures to that series
> because this one becomes too big now.
> And it is rebased to tip/objtool/core branch.

What is the sha1 of the base?

With b4 and git am the patch series is derailing at patch 6 and I'm even
after a bit of fixup (had to use rediff) I'm still getting a cascade of
errors in later patches to decode.c .


Daniel.