Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757304AbXEYFjR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 01:39:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752218AbXEYFjE (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 01:39:04 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:59783 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879AbXEYFjC (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 01:39:02 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] msi: Add support for the Intel chipsets that support MSI. Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 07:38:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jay Cliburn , Grzegorz Krzystek , Andrew Morton , ninex@o2.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Michael Ellerman , David Miller , Tony Luck , len.brown@intel.com References: <200705122146.l4CLkH6q012322@fire-2.osdl.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705250738.57066.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1219 Lines: 31 On Friday 25 May 2007 06:26:50 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > This patch is the result of a quick survey of the Intel chipset > documents. I took a quick look in the document to see if the chipset > supported MSI and if so I looked through to find the vendor and device > id of device 0 function 0 of the chipset and added a quirk for that > device id if I it was not a duplicate. It would be better to look for any PCI bridge. Sometimes there are different PCI bridges around (e.g. external PCI-X bridges on HT systems) which might need own quirks Also in the x86 world Microsoft defined a FADT ACPI flag that MSI doesn't work for Vista. It might make sense to do if (dmi year >= 2007 && FADT.msi_disable not set) assume it works > This patch should be safe. The anecdotal evidence is that when dealing > with MSI the Intel chipsets just work. If we find some buggy ones > changing the list won't be hard. The FADT bit should be probably checked anyways. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/