Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:04:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock()
Message-ID: <20070525080415.GB21446@elte.hu>
References: <20070525071005.GA6431@elte.hu> <a781481a0705250022t3dec8f13u7c75d0ade40b0010@mail.gmail.com> <20070525073158.GB8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525073957.GA15207@elte.hu> <20070525074316.GA16821@elte.hu> <20070525074915.GA18400@elte.hu> <20070525075446.GA20140@elte.hu> <20070525080209.GE8094@one.firstfloor.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070525080209.GE8094@one.firstfloor.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 804
Lines: 23


* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> > the i386 version was supposed to be used. This patch fixes that. 
> > Booted and tested on x86_64 and i386.
> 
> Hmm indeed. I actually had it correct at some point (i remember fixing 
> 64bit compile errors in sched-clock ;-). I guess the Makefile hunk 
> accidentially dropped out during some later merging and this didn't 
> get noticed due to the weak attribute.

well the tsc.h bit was needed too.

> That also explains the issue reported by Peter earlier I guess.

yes, it does, at least on my box.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/