Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:40:37 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] soundwire: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child()
Message-ID: <YrQf/W/Kmo954hAm@matsya>
References: <1843211.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher>
 <2653857.mvXUDI8C0e@kreacher>
 <9017824.rMLUfLXkoz@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9017824.rMLUfLXkoz@kreacher>
Precedence: bulk

On 13-06-22, 20:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
> use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to carry out an action for all of
> the given ACPI device's children.
> 
> This will help to eliminate the children list head from struct
> acpi_device as it is redundant and it is used in questionable ways
> in some places (in particular, locking is needed for walking the
> list pointed to it safely, but it is often missing).

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod