Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp5722968iog; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:12:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ur0U4nal0kxsfEn8RgxmQ8hylOucNZNfJl0sJmzZrwVrURAhr/OdySDJyV36e+nyoX/cxc X-Received: by 2002:a63:3c48:0:b0:40c:f750:42ba with SMTP id i8-20020a633c48000000b0040cf75042bamr7252129pgn.403.1655982741069; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:12:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655982741; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ESdj6mYXWIXBYWwqKZgkOqCO9rfl8EHzbuJ5xMdvEYkgXGL5D7RI5n/qqQ73k/I37j ppeDyf7uZM7PyO/eL12Y9g45d1QydwMtjR/MGjPtAVCH3+CwBggiVc/RbpRLIk2PRREN c2mPK9zUC9eosDPWD4lBnvPn9JJpW7xgmaXCHundBvuovHObKDKe8Ib8UiTu/5oHW++I wN9zkdvgrY9+Am4E9xPB1P8oUnJL8fDb/t/F06NVUl7xhgRCXjF6YqQWskk4yy/Xtq7k 1s1bslBHsNgvgz8C2UrL03Fw4FLLP7UJL95/vqUK6CTffsAvD0sgt3Yz/jw/o7oFwrtG Losw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=f6rg0AIUOdYseXKhNej/elu08vvxD6GhfO44Iabdssg=; b=LcINKxC4QDxrNVbNcea0XOCUeTv+VJe5NvNgj4tXJ2URRxhDrTIU6JdOm8TyqIL+Iz kYxlzFsply9CBTLnU/RiNWJ1mXY/G4EFIV2BFCovvGc5LchJU6K7G7+ztCkdh+/eJEea dZsfNbfNEkvBTP1nIySEakwkRPeRnltnkAqlby11qwx+lunqCTMoO1+15WNaazGG7p0I eFjL4jJB3ofNtjFQD7qjOOkx0c8HjoYTZtGL6sS4K4/RfIDiSancZZmyIv/1xKFPv7cY b9NXpCKvW4guEgN6ZsIrsy0cmT4K+Gseqd0yPBYWhQloX+2v3YOHPsWxRbEe9bZ2GcYq i6/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pj13-20020a17090b4f4d00b001e30a3a5f49si3653805pjb.121.2022.06.23.04.12.07; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231283AbiFWKty (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:49:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46814 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230421AbiFWKtw (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:49:52 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FD764B1E2; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 03:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6DE20624; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:49:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7xdIbu5WkPm; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:49:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailout2.secunet.com (mailout2.secunet.com [62.96.220.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8989920606; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:49:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout2.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A4B80004A; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:49:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:49:49 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:49:49 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2CA53182CD5; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:49:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:49:48 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Stephen Hemminger CC: , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , open list Subject: Re: [RFC] xfrm: convert alg_key to flexible array member Message-ID: <20220623104948.GD566407@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20220524204741.980721-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20220602104515.GI91220@gauss3.secunet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20220602104515.GI91220@gauss3.secunet.de> X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 12:45:15PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:47:40PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Iproute2 build generates a warning when built with gcc-12. > > This is because the alg_key in xfrm.h API has zero size > > array element instead of flexible array. > > > > CC xfrm_state.o > > In function ‘xfrm_algo_parse’, > > inlined from ‘xfrm_state_modify.constprop’ at xfrm_state.c:573:5: > > xfrm_state.c:162:32: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=] > > 162 | buf[j] = val; > > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~ > > > > This patch convert the alg_key into flexible array member. > > There are other zero size arrays here that should be converted as > > well. > > > > This patch is RFC only since it is only compile tested and > > passes trivial iproute2 tests. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > I've put this today to our test systems and it showed no problems, > so we can integrate it after the merge window. This is now applied to ipsec-next, thanks!