Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760587AbXEYJu1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 05:50:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752555AbXEYJuV (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 05:50:21 -0400 Received: from hp3.statik.TU-Cottbus.De ([141.43.120.68]:37265 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751313AbXEYJuU (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 05:50:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4656B15A.6030006@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:50:18 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiri Slaby CC: =?UTF-8?B?SXNtYWlsIETDtm5tZXo=?= , Diego Calleja , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] V4L: stk11xx, add a new webcam driver References: <2172422218943432279@wsc.cz> <20070524193805.1b5d37d9.diegocg@gmail.com> <200705242101.03537.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <46569C29.2050306@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <4af2d03a0705250127j3d05cd6bkb114cad0e6ecb449@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4af2d03a0705250127j3d05cd6bkb114cad0e6ecb449@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1636 Lines: 38 Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 5/25/07, Stefan Richter wrote: >> Ismail Dönmez wrote: >> > On Thursday 24 May 2007 20:38:05 Diego Calleja wrote: >> >> Maybe this is a too picky requeriment, but IMO it would be nice if the >> >> module would be called "camera_stk11xx", or had any other prefix that gives >> >> some meaning about what is doing. It's hard to decipher from the name when >> >> you run lsmod. >> > >> > That would be too picky indeed since other camera modules have no camera_ >> > prefix like pwc,spca5xx, etc. >> >> Then how about adding that prefix to all of them and provide the current >> name as module alias? >> >> Or at least, why not use better names for new modules? > > Just because modules can serve more that one interface of the device? > (audio/mic, camera), (remote controller, dvb grabber). I didn't get > the point of having the prefix in the name, what's the matter? A prefix which describes the function of a driver is of course only useful if it /correctly/ describes it. What would be /correct/? If a driver for a audio + video capable camera supports either both audio and video capture or only video capture, I don't see anything wrong with a prefix like "camera". That said, we have "modinfo" at our disposal if we spot something nondescript in lsmod's listing. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-= ==--= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/