Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761092AbXEYLMj (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 07:12:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753790AbXEYLMc (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 07:12:32 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49172 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751665AbXEYLMb (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 07:12:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:11:40 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: Guillaume Chazarain , Nick Piggin , efault@gmx.de, kernel@kolivas.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, tingy@cs.umass.edu, tong.n.li@intel.com, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS Message-ID: <20070525111140.GA24942@elte.hu> References: <20070523164859.GA6595@in.ibm.com> <3d8471ca0705231112rfac9cfbt9145ac2da8ec1c85@mail.gmail.com> <20070523183824.GA7388@elte.hu> <4654BF88.3030404@yahoo.fr> <20070525074500.GD6157@in.ibm.com> <20070525082951.GA25280@elte.hu> <20070525105641.GA12114@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070525105641.GA12114@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 662 Lines: 19 * Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > btw., what are you thoughts about SMP? > > I was planning on reusing smpnice concepts here, with the difference > that we balance group weights across CPU in addition to total weight > of CPUs. ok, that would be (much) simpler that any explicit vcpu approach. Do you plan to add this next? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/