Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759939AbXEYMH0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 08:07:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751121AbXEYMHU (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 08:07:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:36847 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751312AbXEYMHT (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 08:07:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:05:36 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: Guillaume Chazarain , Nick Piggin , efault@gmx.de, kernel@kolivas.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, tingy@cs.umass.edu, tong.n.li@intel.com, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS Message-ID: <20070525120536.GB7186@elte.hu> References: <20070523164859.GA6595@in.ibm.com> <3d8471ca0705231112rfac9cfbt9145ac2da8ec1c85@mail.gmail.com> <20070523183824.GA7388@elte.hu> <4654BF88.3030404@yahoo.fr> <20070525074500.GD6157@in.ibm.com> <20070525082951.GA25280@elte.hu> <20070525105641.GA12114@in.ibm.com> <20070525111140.GA24942@elte.hu> <20070525112849.GG6157@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070525112849.GG6157@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1103 Lines: 26 * Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:11:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > I was planning on reusing smpnice concepts here, with the difference > > > that we balance group weights across CPU in addition to total weight > > > of CPUs. > > > > ok, that would be (much) simpler that any explicit vcpu approach. Do you > > plan to add this next? > > sure, after i first cleanup current group changes a bit. Hopefully I > can send you first version of smp support by early next week. great. Btw., could you please keep the "up to this point there should be no behavioral change in CFS" fundamental splitup of your patches - that way i can look at the core changes (and possibly apply them) without having to consider the uid based changes (which do change behavior and which need more upstream buy-in). Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/