Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc:     kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: remove generic ARM cpuidle support
Date:   Thu, 23 Jun 2022 20:31:42 +0100
Message-Id: <165599037407.2971163.13182128360037725255.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220529181329.2345722-1-michael@walle.cc>
References: <20220529181329.2345722-1-michael@walle.cc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 29 May 2022 20:13:27 +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Playing with an own PSCI implementation, I've noticed that the cpuidle-arm
> driver doesn't work on arm64. It doesn't probe because since commit
> 788961462f34 ("ARM: psci: cpuidle: Enable PSCI CPUidle driver") the
> arm_cpuidle_init() can only return -EOPNOTSUPP, because the commit removed
> the cpu_idle_init and cpu_suspend ops.
> 
> It left me puzzled for quite some time. It seems that the cpuidle-psci is
> the preferred one and this has been the case for quite some time. The
> mentioned commit first appeared in v5.4.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/cpuidle), thanks!

[1/2] cpuidle: cpuidle-arm: remove arm64 support
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/51280acad855
[2/2] arm64: cpuidle: remove generic cpuidle support
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/471f80db9ef1

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev