Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763764AbXEYQ2x (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 12:28:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752912AbXEYQ2r (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 12:28:47 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:50802 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752700AbXEYQ2q (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 12:28:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2 From: Daniel Walker To: Andrew Morton Cc: Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Satyam Sharma , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20070525091743.5fb569a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070525015544.bce3cb99.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070525090315.GK8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525091928.GA3177@elte.hu> <20070525094640.GL8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525101248.GA7547@elte.hu> <20070525112020.GN8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525112600.GA27007@elte.hu> <20070525115004.GA4574@elte.hu> <20070525115544.GP8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525120228.GA7186@elte.hu> <20070525121540.GA24083@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525091743.5fb569a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:26:14 -0700 Message-Id: <1180110374.31211.42.camel@imap.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1270 Lines: 31 On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 09:17 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2007 14:15:40 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > -Andi (who hopes this thread will end soon now and we can all go > > back to more important issues) > > fyi, the thread has been damn useful for me. If Ingo hadn't spotted that > preempt_count() imbalance then there's a decent chance that I'd have been > the first to hit it. > > Time to bisect 1,000 patches: maybe an hour, if I choose the x86 tree as > the first pivot point, which is likely. > > Or I wouldn't have hit it, in which case a tester hits it, and someone > (guess who) gets to enter into an intercontinental head-scratching session > trying to work out who broke it this time, consuming the tester's time too. > Plus we have a wrecked -mm and other people's code doesn't get as > well-tested as it might. > > All for one silly little mistake. I wonder if this was the source of the lockdep selftest failures, or the mystery hang this patch caused (IIRC).. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/