Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763500AbXEYROJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 13:14:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752779AbXEYRN6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 13:13:58 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:38203 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751896AbXEYRN6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 13:13:58 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Multiple free during oprofile unload Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 19:13:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Chuck Ebbert , linux-kernel References: <4656FA04.5000403@redhat.com> <200705251742.35692.ak@novell.com> <20070525161837.GA26105@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20070525161837.GA26105@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705251913.53097.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 636 Lines: 17 > > So what, the alternative is leave oprofile busted in 2.6.21.x even longer? stable is about backporting _well tested_ patches from mainline. If the stable request comes in from someone 5 minutes after the mainline submission I don't see how that testing should happen. A grace period of a few days at least is usually appropiate for normal patches (unless it's a security bug) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/