Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <0378a9e1-a2f9-5c7d-2fdd-0a78ff237db9@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:12:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 7/7] ARM: dts: aspeed: centriq2400: use qcom
 compatible
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To:     Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Cc:     Steven Lee <steven_lee@aspeedtech.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Ken Chen <chen.kenyy@inventec.com>,
        linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        David Wang <David_Wang6097@jabil.com>
References: <20220529104928.79636-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <20220529104928.79636-7-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <165589305701.29629.10216921074802952879.b4-ty@linaro.org>
 <CACPK8XfxXi8kQr+vxta8rD6SBgxLf_oBjAH0UkPBacQta552YQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <84cba0c8-fb31-3314-5e2c-7a0c13030b9a@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <84cba0c8-fb31-3314-5e2c-7a0c13030b9a@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 23/06/2022 09:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/06/2022 07:34, Joel Stanley wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 10:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 29 May 2022 12:49:28 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> "qualcomm" is not a documented compatible and instead "qcom" should be
>>>> used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> What tree did you apply this to? Did you get review from the maintainer?
> 
> Tree was mentioned below.
> 
>>
>> This board is unmaintained and unused. I would prefer it removed
>> rather than meaningless fixes be applied.
> 
> I can drop the patch. I'll send the patch to remove the board.

Does your answer also means that you are planning to take these? I am
going to prepare a pull request to arm-soc so need to know whether to
keep these or not. I don't have any particular need of handling these
patches by myself, but I want the issues to get fixed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof