Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761664AbXEYTPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 15:15:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752010AbXEYTO4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 15:14:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52038 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751721AbXEYTOz (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 May 2007 15:14:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 21:14:47 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Satyam Sharma , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups, #2 Message-ID: <20070525191447.GA19412@elte.hu> References: <20070525090315.GK8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525091928.GA3177@elte.hu> <20070525094640.GL8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525101248.GA7547@elte.hu> <20070525112020.GN8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525112600.GA27007@elte.hu> <20070525115004.GA4574@elte.hu> <20070525115544.GP8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525120228.GA7186@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1129 Lines: 23 * Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ingo: to make things easier, the _best_ split-up would be not "this is > the historical series of patches leading up to CFS v15" or something > like that, but it would be nice to get that final CFS version as a > series of patches that do some specific things rather than as one > final one. Is there any possibility that could happen? sure enough, i'll work something sane out - i already have it partly split up. It will probably be something along the lines of: 'remove stuff that we can remove and still have functional scheduling' followed by an 'add minimal CFS patch' and then nicely split up 'CFS related add-ons' (like the task-stats accounting things, debugging, etc). Do you think i should try to split up the core CFS bits some more beyond this level? (that would be quite nontrivial i suspect) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/