Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220603195626.121922-1-dlatypov@google.com> <87pmix3ktq.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
 <2c3399e9-4f4e-a71a-4030-e4e6d72b5d4e@linuxfoundation.org>
 <8735ft3co5.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <96154234-7842-3bc9-d89f-eb20be40e6de@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <96154234-7842-3bc9-d89f-eb20be40e6de@linuxfoundation.org>
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:40:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGS_qxpQvftq2qiiaNhr5sAkJWgQhtB1CK2_ZeYASLYynWVHRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Documentation: kunit: remove duplicate kunit-tool.rst
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, brendanhiggins@google.com,
        davidgow@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 3:51 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/24/22 4:43 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> >
> >>> So not that long ago these patches were going through Shuah...it seems
> >>> that's not happening anymore?  I can pick up kunit docs patches,
> >>> certainly.  I've taken the silence on these as assent and applied them.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am still taking ksefltest and kunit doc patches through my tree. I wait
> >> for Brendan to ack at times. This one didn't show up in linux-kselftest
> >> list it appears.
> >>
> >> If you cc linux-kselftest and I get an ack from Brendan, I will take this
> >> through kselftest tree.
> >
> > As I said up above, I went ahead and applied them.  I can drop them
> > again if you want to carry them, just let me know.
> >
>
> Jon, yes please go ahead and drop this one. I will wait for Brendan
> to ack it. Reduces confusion in the future. Very often, there is code
> dependencies as well.
>
> Daniel, please don't skip kselftest list in the future.

Ack.
I was hoping to avoid confusion about who should apply them; looks
like it created more.

Just a note: this one has no code dependencies, so it can be applied
whenever or wherever.

Daniel