Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
To:     <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:     <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
        <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        <bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>, <bristot@redhat.com>,
        "open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   "guanjing (D)" <guanjing6@huawei.com>
Subject: Fwd: Question about how to fix numabalancing to work with isolated
 cpus?
Message-ID: <ccd220cd-fbca-ad8a-c290-e812c4850e2f@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jun 2022 14:33:13 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,
     I notice a problem that you guys discussed in the link below:

     https://lore.kernel.org/all/1491464210.4718.82.camel@gmx.de/T/
     "The isolated cpus are part of the cpus allowed list. In the above 
case,
      numabalancing ends up scheduling some of these tasks on isolated 
cpus. "

     I wonder if we're going to fix this eventually?

Thanks,
Guan Jing