Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp1176138iog; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 02:57:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ucThn0oK/02PPUjg870JHyQfZUqkY4mlJsnWE+rrvn4V9hY36T2rIO9WHr68MGJIQpDHo+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:300d:b0:16a:b0c:333 with SMTP id o13-20020a170903300d00b0016a0b0c0333mr3477670pla.26.1656151053233; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 02:57:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656151053; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bloFdeAp83MobF9n8tGJxuUAmO07fGzd/SXRfxvvzmfeDK6shr5yRKv5POxE4DSNuR hKXccSIMrpANKragh1QCs+z55VdxyoHO+iy0w0bG8Fjs0J8BRQWz3n8K+bd2QIazo2OZ /QNTNmHWNTeWrxLdc05rnXOGJG6qbpgHzSHBl/C13tDAWRqLlgdBCkZUfjPRRjdWPLJG t8AGQNxn3hYTCqymFiC4wTSAJh8tsDziMNWFlxceYVjxrCHzbE8hVfTgNlbQgTbL35a1 libxkCaj0HK2eTL5l536cZikirDXh5vHajWpL22vYVFyxItcbTkPG4jW5Ch3jojTOJF7 ArQg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ipCFUgNwzMpgoMN73bdSEkq7uG/MIoSBuXFMNmZIaQ4=; b=JdNKovRj7inC3Q1XrDRT2jqHzfn+H1QtGooZugMHGf6NGFAXHwlTTpJqBK5nAhTTLF ev3NA5066cmOtKM4Yc+iz5UyZLoWkrYSA530tZqIMY0npcEL1CAd4DDixm9AUs9owccj tUx35tRZJTIJs/AnhWsqK92g/TdCG58O0BEIYD5Fc4ncLiRUs1B/zb+cAwDLfWp97M/S qS9csIsb+Ae6gce2B5rn5aOehPVtBZRUnpmNm5/vo7nEzvuP6UpK6NL70NEMKMsKAU2U ELsHEHW3GslGKxfAbqRsO46mDSOY/VmpQVELEhcwGAjYgr+ZBTDkPT/1//PMMmZAQ+Sx cKpg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o10-20020a17090a0a0a00b001d996a5c5e4si6172468pjo.128.2022.06.25.02.57.19; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 02:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232437AbiFYJvX (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 05:51:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48274 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232468AbiFYJvV (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 05:51:21 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85F139B80 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 02:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 0158768AA6; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 11:51:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 11:51:15 +0200 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Sven Peter Cc: "hch@lst.de" , kernel test robot , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hector Martin , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [asahilinux:bits/050-nvme 6/9] drivers/nvme/host/apple.c:291:19: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) Message-ID: <20220625095115.GA23965@lst.de> References: <202206251551.PTd0wn6d-lkp@intel.com> <20220625075950.GA22592@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 11:46:55AM +0200, Sven Peter wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2022, at 09:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Sven, can you send a patch to use the proper __le types? We really > > prefer the nvme code to no have any sparse warnings. > > Arnd already fixed this with 7ad7ab90368 after the commits hit the soc tree > (and before I even had a chance to look at it). > This mail just came from our downstream tree that's still stuck at 5.18. Perfect, thanks!