Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <46ec1f38-dcbe-f87c-4f37-999d24eec522@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:10:00 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom-scm: convert to dtschema
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>,
        David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220623182542.1116677-1-robimarko@gmail.com>
 <26cdc24c-e0e8-1059-f6ca-11c08615eeca@linaro.org>
 <CAOX2RU7aEaBt_PYS2UA6BES+dJgx4n2QPHJ6yWYWZuTt2SLXoA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOX2RU7aEaBt_PYS2UA6BES+dJgx4n2QPHJ6yWYWZuTt2SLXoA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 25/06/2022 10:50, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 11:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 23/06/2022 20:25, Robert Marko wrote:
>>> Convert bindings for Qualcomm SCM to dtschema.
>>>
>>> SoC compatibles that were used, but not documented were added.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
>>
>> This was already submitted:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211218194038.26913-1-david@ixit.cz/
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> I was not aware there was already a version sent, just used linux-next
> as the base


lore and "dfn" keyword. Several people are working on Qualcomm bindings,
so that's the only way to check it.

> and it wasn't there so I assumed, will search through the archives next time.
> 
> Anyway, that attempt looks abandoned.

Let's give few days to David to respond and to re-submit. If he does, I
am for FIFO approach. If David does not resubmits, then check the review
he got to be sure there is no need for same feedback.


Best regards,
Krzysztof