Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220625110115.39956-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20220625110115.39956-2-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <YreI9h957ZWv99OR@zx2c4.com>
In-Reply-To: <YreI9h957ZWv99OR@zx2c4.com>
From:   Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Jun 2022 19:54:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH2r5mt1LSaRSSPx6xUxC=S4tATFNqdxmS-yWmfcPp+vibVRxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] ksmbd: use vfs_llseek instead of dereferencing NULL
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc:     Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

I just added it to ksmbd-for-next

Thx.

On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 5:20 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 01:01:08PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > By not checking whether llseek is NULL, this might jump to NULL. Also,
> > it doesn't check FMODE_LSEEK. Fix this by using vfs_llseek(), which
> > always does the right thing.
> >
> > Fixes: f44158485826 ("cifsd: add file operations")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
> > Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
> > Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
>
> This commit has been reviewed by Namjae and acked by Al. The rest of the
> commits in this series are likely -next material for Al to take in his
> vfs tree, but this first one here is something you might consider taking
> as a somewhat important bug fix for 5.19. I marked it for stable@ and
> such as well. Your call -- you can punt it to Al's -next branch with the
> rest of the series if you want -- but I think this patch is a bit unlike
> the others. This occurred to me when I saw you sent some cifs fixes in
> earlier this evening.
>
> Jason


-- 
Thanks,

Steve