Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp1894024iog; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:41:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t+tMpxXuy6a0b+1G1qWQd7xy1sOuc6erzhmig7uiJvC01D54Tw9aQ/VDiR7kjr+XIzNLpb X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3220:b0:435:8b50:e995 with SMTP id g32-20020a056402322000b004358b50e995mr9775260eda.293.1656229315630; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:41:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656229315; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zUfwdC89T0R3ZkWgRtjHqfM7EnhhjDIGhlKd4/vkZD0sN+8Rbd6roFYQEmF7BTUZak BBHfvnmRkEPysBQPAFBNPgUFAR+sA85//DYyPJNnQUlxeykrePUS6x0F1aLQ7Svr8YOa vCryiZa2JVBt+3vkBAbbqxn9B75lsiwrRAnuCO/9/G/mu7Frsn3F6TPPhRVA12J4Vf+E jTf8DZI4/WjUOEPawMflxcU3kRGbXJpihHu8EewggA6aEytO9fNDaadUKca4HFX+UvVf MiX+uhfWXjMfpIU8XJmtN4BS2EMjV1uzPHXXfiKtByxX0x593wIQlzdgPjzhfMCSSbNp D3yw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=4PbdkpS8MfHZOMT2Rlz7MqE3c9VuVNsn+yA+0qTRvU8=; b=X6JIu7oEkFXPTmQouxtHDTjv7pHe6rXPeQYOOL46BqsPgiHeL0k4/bC612Llmbya8Y AGUZ7twUS9ZEjDmzd8PrYlQGms9nKtMwp+tw9ZLfKuz5IPlNGsMBJnLC5ZGtbyIIDMLd SxcfWZBoJbDRZKfbYzwVaC6H9kHh8wiz2aCLW6iUcUYadOib50uTQ5bcC7YuTu4lRoGU ql5TtHsteBiikjmpVpI8LNX1dY5FT+p5F7ixvl0/cAZVIVZEE0eK4etYtG3iFGes4HGk Ysj8Zx8Rw2kncz1VYPuLivnd8y8Z0jLDmL6wx+yquwnfxO3n2/bPNVNT85MEYVYpxd8W IQig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v25-20020a50d599000000b0043565b4bda3si8587310edi.521.2022.06.26.00.41.20; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233777AbiFZHjl (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 26 Jun 2022 03:39:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34798 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229742AbiFZHjk (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2022 03:39:40 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8914BFD22; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:39:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3BED6E; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:39:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.71.61]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13F243F792; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 00:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 08:39:26 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com Cc: broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 1/6] arm64: Split unwind_init() Message-ID: References: <20220617210717.27126-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20220617210717.27126-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220617210717.27126-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:07:12PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: > From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" > > unwind_init() is currently a single function that initializes all of the > unwind state. Split it into the following functions and call them > appropriately: > > - unwind_init_from_regs() - initialize from regs passed by caller. > > - unwind_init_from_caller() - initialize for the current task > from the caller of arch_stack_walk(). > > - unwind_init_from_task() - initialize from the saved state of a > task other than the current task. In this case, the other > task must not be running. > > This is done for two reasons: > > - the different ways of initializing are clear > > - specialized code can be added to each initializer in the future. > > Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman > Reviewed-by: Mark Brown Acked-by: Mark Rutland Mark. > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > index 0467cb79f080..e44f93ff25f0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c > @@ -50,11 +50,8 @@ struct unwind_state { > #endif > }; > > -static notrace void unwind_init(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long fp, > - unsigned long pc) > +static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state) > { > - state->fp = fp; > - state->pc = pc; > #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES > state->kr_cur = NULL; > #endif > @@ -72,7 +69,57 @@ static notrace void unwind_init(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long fp, > state->prev_fp = 0; > state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN; > } > -NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_init); > + > +/* > + * Start an unwind from a pt_regs. > + * > + * The unwind will begin at the PC within the regs. > + * > + * The regs must be on a stack currently owned by the calling task. > + */ > +static inline void unwind_init_from_regs(struct unwind_state *state, > + struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + unwind_init_common(state); > + > + state->fp = regs->regs[29]; > + state->pc = regs->pc; > +} > + > +/* > + * Start an unwind from a caller. > + * > + * The unwind will begin at the caller of whichever function this is inlined > + * into. > + * > + * The function which invokes this must be noinline. > + */ > +static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_caller(struct unwind_state *state) > +{ > + unwind_init_common(state); > + > + state->fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1); > + state->pc = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0); > +} > + > +/* > + * Start an unwind from a blocked task. > + * > + * The unwind will begin at the blocked tasks saved PC (i.e. the caller of > + * cpu_switch_to()). > + * > + * The caller should ensure the task is blocked in cpu_switch_to() for the > + * duration of the unwind, or the unwind will be bogus. It is never valid to > + * call this for the current task. > + */ > +static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state, > + struct task_struct *task) > +{ > + unwind_init_common(state); > + > + state->fp = thread_saved_fp(task); > + state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task); > +} > > /* > * Unwind from one frame record (A) to the next frame record (B). > @@ -213,14 +260,11 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, > struct unwind_state state; > > if (regs) > - unwind_init(&state, regs->regs[29], regs->pc); > + unwind_init_from_regs(&state, regs); > else if (task == current) > - unwind_init(&state, > - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1), > - (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0)); > + unwind_init_from_caller(&state); > else > - unwind_init(&state, thread_saved_fp(task), > - thread_saved_pc(task)); > + unwind_init_from_task(&state, task); > > unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie); > } > -- > 2.25.1 >