Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220623182542.1116677-1-robimarko@gmail.com> <26cdc24c-e0e8-1059-f6ca-11c08615eeca@linaro.org>
 <CAOX2RU7aEaBt_PYS2UA6BES+dJgx4n2QPHJ6yWYWZuTt2SLXoA@mail.gmail.com> <46ec1f38-dcbe-f87c-4f37-999d24eec522@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <46ec1f38-dcbe-f87c-4f37-999d24eec522@linaro.org>
From:   Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jun 2022 15:41:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOX2RU4zhtwacgWWwZehnRBXw9qUgVPdfOexOWeKSxe-tt=ZHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom-scm: convert to dtschema
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 at 22:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2022 10:50, Robert Marko wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 11:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23/06/2022 20:25, Robert Marko wrote:
> >>> Convert bindings for Qualcomm SCM to dtschema.
> >>>
> >>> SoC compatibles that were used, but not documented were added.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> This was already submitted:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211218194038.26913-1-david@ixit.cz/
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > I was not aware there was already a version sent, just used linux-next
> > as the base
>
>
> lore and "dfn" keyword. Several people are working on Qualcomm bindings,
> so that's the only way to check it.
>
> > and it wasn't there so I assumed, will search through the archives next time.
> >
> > Anyway, that attempt looks abandoned.
>
> Let's give few days to David to respond and to re-submit. If he does, I
> am for FIFO approach. If David does not resubmits, then check the review
> he got to be sure there is no need for same feedback.

I see that David sent a v2 today, I'm just glad to get this converted.

Regards,
Robert
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof