Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 26 Jun 2022 17:10:12 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC[ Alloc in vsprintf
Message-ID: <20220626211012.aurhmgdolvt6vnbt@moria.home.lan>
References: <20220620150514.3tjy5dv7pv5frcwd@moria.home.lan>
 <53d77ae6101a0f24cfb694174d4c7699424c57e8.camel@perches.com>
 <20220621005752.ohiq5besmy3r5rjo@moria.home.lan>
 <a795818f9a49ed401bffc7c38ca7e39ae449e9e0.camel@perches.com>
 <c1a92cf059fc9a3c395d87b11e9f757f5ec1ff6a.camel@perches.com>
 <355e912490dbaef8fe4e12df0201c3f5b439565d.camel@perches.com>
 <CAHk-=whwyxSpzgr+roEr7_V5wVenw9fV3EOAZhAYCAuRdEyChQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <93ab94ec92497af13c563c52fc7e1f7f81dac333.camel@perches.com>
 <20220626205158.bqeyetui3cromscp@moria.home.lan>
 <20e7ca5f3b7b5b473afe891e8b28c83de62bc6d6.camel@perches.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20e7ca5f3b7b5b473afe891e8b28c83de62bc6d6.camel@perches.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 02:02:31PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Because the stack use in _this_ function is quite large.
> Backporting to stable would be trivial.
> No so with printbufs.

Yeah, I'm not so sure "do what's easiest to backport to stable" makes any sense
to me.