Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:23:58 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     RAJESH DASARI <raajeshdasari@gmail.com>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reg: rseq selftests failed on 5.4.199
Message-ID: <YrlbDgpIVFvh5L9O@kroah.com>
References: <CAPXMrf-_RGYBJNu51rq2mdzcpf7Sk_z3kRNL9pmLvf4xmUkmow@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPXMrf-_RGYBJNu51rq2mdzcpf7Sk_z3kRNL9pmLvf4xmUkmow@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:01:20PM +0300, RAJESH DASARI wrote:
> Hi ,
> 
> We are running rseq selftests on 5.4.199 kernel with  glibc 2.34
> version  and we see that tests are failing to compile with invalid
> argument errors. When we took all the commits from
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/tools/testing/selftests/rseq
>  related to rseq locally , test cases have passed. I see that there are
> some adaptations to the latest glibc version done in those commits, is
> there any plan to backport them to 5.4.x versions. Could you please
> provide your inputs.

What commits specifically are you referring to please?  A list of them
would be great, and if you have tested them and verified that they can
be backported cleanly would also be very helpful.

thanks,

greg k-h