Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761163AbXEZSKu (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2007 14:10:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753609AbXEZSKm (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2007 14:10:42 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:59322 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753554AbXEZSKl (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2007 14:10:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4658781D.5070108@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:10:37 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robert P. J. Day" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Transform old-style macros to newer "__noreturn" standard. References: <46572DAF.1000108@zytor.com> <46573B23.1090700@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 830 Lines: 22 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > It does not make sense for a noreturn function to have a return type > other than void. > ^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ > =============================================================== > > so I'm just going to stick with the pattern that's been used so far. > i realize it offends your sense of syntactic sensibility, but it's > just not worth treating that one attribute so differently from the > rest of them. > Why are you so hung up over the fact that the *implementation* of this is an attribute? You're totally confusing interface and implementation. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/