Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: i0ad843c9:Fastmail
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] irqchip/sifive-plic: Name the chip more
 generically
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
        Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@sifive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
References: <20220627051257.38543-1-samuel@sholland.org>
 <20220627051257.38543-3-samuel@sholland.org>
 <20511a05f39408c8ffbcc98923c4abd2@kernel.org>
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Message-ID: <b031cfb7-6a50-cc01-3b8c-5e75d01b4a43@sholland.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 08:40:30 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20511a05f39408c8ffbcc98923c4abd2@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/27/22 2:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2022-06-27 06:12, Samuel Holland wrote:
>> The interface for SiFive's PLIC was adopted and clarified by RISC-V as
>> the standard PLIC interface. Now that several PLIC implementations by
>> different vendors share this same interface, it is somewhat misleading
>> to report "SiFive PLIC" to userspace, when no SiFive hardware may be
>> present. This is especially the case when some implementations are
>> subtly incompatible with the binding and behavior of the SiFive PLIC,
>> yet are similar enough to share a driver.
> 
> Too late. This is ABI, and not changing, exactly because userspace
> sees it.

That makes sense. I will drop this patch.

Regards,
Samuel