Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com, tiwai@suse.com, perex@perex.cz,
        daowens01@gmail.com, peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dowens@precisionplanting.com,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
In-Reply-To: <20220620183744.3176557-1-dowens@precisionplanting.com>
References: <20220620183744.3176557-1-dowens@precisionplanting.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp: duplicate sysfs error
Message-Id: <165636114844.3997797.17880127627282990674.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 21:19:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:37:43 -0500, David Owens wrote:
> From: David Owens <daowens01@gmail.com>
> 
> Convert to managed versions of sysfs and clk allocation to simplify
> unbinding and error handling in probe.  Managed sysfs node
> creation specifically addresses the following error seen the second time
> probe is attempted after sdma_pcm_platform_register() previously requsted
> probe deferral:
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp: duplicate sysfs error
      commit: 6d31e225742a1955db8a0c6f6f52beb748a2895e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark