Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp3450159iog; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:44:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sDKO3heX23JbTczSeOj7RBPbhm0DydA2safnAQ7iP32FfNnRItQ7pPW7A/ns33TPZqBgQP X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:43c7:b0:435:8a92:e8d0 with SMTP id p7-20020a05640243c700b004358a92e8d0mr20086338edc.174.1656373487773; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:44:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656373487; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e/2h8m/BZ1XhhemH2kwsty1SvH3FmbgERBZKWpVc0uaLSp7kSBRLt6TAEn9hY5hZiW NPRz5AUgwiWcXlAoZaBiEQKMR0AmJNofooCdULztPyoCMlBc5YWBgohU8bTRPrbJKMwR i/VNL2EXUtWLRg3sL1cgzj1ZApYr2Q7nYZDIsSBenoenae3ERoaPDiXS8oLCDQDcsgAG DzWy55T8xjS1mJQsZxi5o2JRmqgupldlBGK551hSMX0/+yLHWbV0FFUyYo6DrbFWVp06 a1Nktj5QjPxES6XOCXXhWm7BE2tltuI7sQd0rtBHW4Lcy8lRqs3zgIDGN4jtK2Hi4Soa JSPQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=J8p2fOgowjsf8oZFxqGZOg/EZjm2/fdInQfV8uj3Tg4=; b=ZqAPRnL8j9/o94ylqo/OP6dxa9qgI5294FOj8K4d85M0s1Xg+tLBwCnGjCOMq7zbEk 1YMifuDzhf6gruXdT85eCmFLl6OOznrZ//shuWeeC7h37mh5e9iodz9GH0SpdU3J9UoG G0LfO5Sxjyw+pOh7QLZJYU4MG723Z3IZivXQdJiikkTRLLCJh7kitA6UDbktzGjt1A/i Moj7MQfKUln8atFcM7SeS+OCRI6qQlbk15wI4a7Efhg1krOgz0ZD392SRkBzloB/nhQS yD0PnBOWE4H3kOzGMa2SeHdGr+6cc1pgd31j7vhmZdVGGWj+hdhb0WUhM5x2oKI3NwTi mXUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=lmyYiyM2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e18-20020a170906c01200b0071d94f55dddsi12248385ejz.130.2022.06.27.16.44.23; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=lmyYiyM2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240338AbiF0WyJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:54:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59334 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236092AbiF0WyI (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:54:08 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb29.google.com (mail-yb1-xb29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9660FC7 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb29.google.com with SMTP id v185so9701296ybe.8 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J8p2fOgowjsf8oZFxqGZOg/EZjm2/fdInQfV8uj3Tg4=; b=lmyYiyM2j12gO44/NHgBsznv8Acdn7rsGx9LOa1DMDnJsxBloM50R+jyM8b/1ZxvBk kytYIdVlUB7GUDhGXKTKOwKLAP8msdy5HycKv3A/EKbsr9VrkED/V3e2H0VeZ2ijTPXe ArJWK5/1Mg/g5ali4c83gq4U+77uA0AxgOnSIzD9fZTcwBjolJEzwLy1KlwvZO/ZAf0e 1K+s+qpynni/dm0cIaKOOqyxlKefWZZB0/x+dSnqT0EKkVv3F7NP3ToftLzeRymoeHUX evOLbjOieo2GWJsVWTqJPQvzeHFSltOb3FcG4S7SjIhVGMZnPKgXIdUpnTc1jIuHF0jZ 9/lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J8p2fOgowjsf8oZFxqGZOg/EZjm2/fdInQfV8uj3Tg4=; b=PafNqLiJlHHG+2JJ1/v+68Ymy8qI8zVYyQVLA0zg/sfKb1gALQwKMH2ztKgMkmtja9 dQV3JYa5+q3PHQe5nOow8lL1QAUnh9e9M9RRrn0jw2mkvZtQhCsQh03DRLmIGMnQA+bz w+pwe0rIH+r/RBTt88bK7rK/EHzWKY75MfH6eBSr6WNloDOi3ZcnsKLeY0US9KBqlh8e /6bt4m5qNjT3WwxVysyY1DiXxSxdHuSzSUPoXZJrjRdbBOnZSf7VOUhAWw6kft4LcixT I65TtQN00LgjfsxrcrwwP3AX7X+aIkXw7f0dgewq8HFFw5+Tts7nzibMozuNnZnq3uvh tcGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8Ecfu8TC/I4MoFRWPcBQB1gIrxLIN2afZcXIaws8LsawN2cQEl MKWfOdgt5amIec2pM+61Dhpkm5CmmzqZGWxO0RKAag== X-Received: by 2002:a5b:a04:0:b0:668:dd55:1ca8 with SMTP id k4-20020a5b0a04000000b00668dd551ca8mr16521779ybq.281.1656370446631; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:54:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220619120451.95251-1-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> <20220619120451.95251-2-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> In-Reply-To: <20220619120451.95251-2-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> From: Josh Don Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:53:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] sched/fair: default to false in test_idle_cores To: Abel Wu Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Vincent Guittot , Chen Yu , Tim Chen , K Prateek Nayak , "Gautham R . Shenoy" , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 5:05 AM Abel Wu wrote: > > It's uncertain whether idle cores exist or not if shared sched-domains > are not ready, so returning "no idle cores" usually makes sense. > > While __update_idle_core() is an exception, it checks status of this > core and set to shared sched-domain if necessary. So the whole logic > depends on the existence of shared domain, and can bail out early if > it isn't available. Modern compilers seems capable of handling such > cases, so remove the tricky self-defined default return value. I don't think the compiler will be able to bail out of the smt iteration early, since it'll have to do another rcu dereference for the sd_llc in set(). But I also don't think this case needs optimization, since it should be transient while the domain isn't ready. Reviewed-by: Josh Don