Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 23:59:57 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: possible trace_printk() bug in v5.19-rc1
Message-ID: <20220627235957.78aed6cd@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20220624190819.59df11d3@rorschach.local.home>
References: <F6C267B0-83EA-4151-A4EC-44482AC52C59@oracle.com>
        <20220616113400.15335d91@gandalf.local.home>
        <E309A098-DA06-490D-A75C-E6295C2987B9@oracle.com>
        <20220617155019.373adda7@gandalf.local.home>
        <3BAD2CD9-3A34-4140-A28C-0FE798B83C41@oracle.com>
        <355D2478-33D3-4046-8422-E512F42C51BC@oracle.com>
        <20220624190819.59df11d3@rorschach.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 19:08:19 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:57:23 +0000
> Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Yes, I'm sure. I just checked out v5.18 and built it with the
> > > same CONFIG. trace_printk() on that kernel generates function
> > > names as expected.    
> > 
> > I moved my development work to another system, and bisected. The
> > result:
> > 
> > 91fb02f31505 ("module: Move kallsyms support into a separate file")  
> 
> Hmm, right below that it says:
> 
>    "No functional change."
> 
> I'm guessing it may not be as reliably reproducible.

I take this back. I bisected it down to this commit as well.

I found another patch in that series that has a function change, so I do
not trust this. This most definitely has a functional change, as the output
of kallsyms changes with it. I'll report it against that patch submission.

-- Steve


> 
> And is this an issue with trace-cmd output or reading the trace file?