Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:00:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PK: runtime: Redefine pm_runtime_release_supplier()
Message-ID: <YrqY+c1NPQ+wEiUk@kroah.com>
References: <2653259.mvXUDI8C0e@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2653259.mvXUDI8C0e@kreacher>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 08:42:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Instead of passing an extra bool argument to pm_runtime_release_supplier(),
> make its callers take care of triggering a runtime-suspend of the
> supplier device as needed.
> 
> No expected functional impact.
> 
> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Nice, thanks for cleaning this up.

If you want to take this through your tree:
	Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

But if you want me to take it, please just let me know and I will.

thanks,

greg k-h