Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:14:38 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To:     Guowei Du <duguoweisz@gmail.com>
Cc:     jack@suse.cz, amir73il@gmail.com, repnop@google.com,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        duguowei <duguowei@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] fanotify: add inline modifier
Message-ID: <20220628091438.llx3qvwvjxmb57vu@quack3>
References: <20220628081731.22411-1-duguoweisz@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220628081731.22411-1-duguoweisz@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue 28-06-22 16:17:31, Guowei Du wrote:
> From: duguowei <duguowei@xiaomi.com>
> 
> No functional change.
> This patch only makes a little change for compiling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: duguowei <duguowei@xiaomi.com>

Thanks for the patch but I'm sorry I don't see a benefit of these changes.
For static functions 'inline' is not really useful because the compiler
decides about inlining of static functions on its own.

Also the change to fanotify_fh_equal() makes the code less readable, not
more...

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 16 +++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> index 4f897e109547..a32752350e0e 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> @@ -18,12 +18,12 @@
>  
>  #include "fanotify.h"
>  
> -static bool fanotify_path_equal(struct path *p1, struct path *p2)
> +static inline bool fanotify_path_equal(struct path *p1, struct path *p2)
>  {
>  	return p1->mnt == p2->mnt && p1->dentry == p2->dentry;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int fanotify_hash_path(const struct path *path)
> +static inline unsigned int fanotify_hash_path(const struct path *path)
>  {
>  	return hash_ptr(path->dentry, FANOTIFY_EVENT_HASH_BITS) ^
>  		hash_ptr(path->mnt, FANOTIFY_EVENT_HASH_BITS);
> @@ -35,20 +35,18 @@ static inline bool fanotify_fsid_equal(__kernel_fsid_t *fsid1,
>  	return fsid1->val[0] == fsid2->val[0] && fsid1->val[1] == fsid2->val[1];
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int fanotify_hash_fsid(__kernel_fsid_t *fsid)
> +static inline unsigned int fanotify_hash_fsid(__kernel_fsid_t *fsid)
>  {
>  	return hash_32(fsid->val[0], FANOTIFY_EVENT_HASH_BITS) ^
>  		hash_32(fsid->val[1], FANOTIFY_EVENT_HASH_BITS);
>  }
>  
> -static bool fanotify_fh_equal(struct fanotify_fh *fh1,
> +static inline bool fanotify_fh_equal(struct fanotify_fh *fh1,
>  			      struct fanotify_fh *fh2)
>  {
> -	if (fh1->type != fh2->type || fh1->len != fh2->len)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	return !fh1->len ||
> -		!memcmp(fanotify_fh_buf(fh1), fanotify_fh_buf(fh2), fh1->len);
> +	return fh1->type == fh2->type && fh1->len == fh2->len &&
> +		(!fh1->len ||
> +		 !memcmp(fanotify_fh_buf(fh1), fanotify_fh_buf(fh2), fh1->len));
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int fanotify_hash_fh(struct fanotify_fh *fh)
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR