Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757511AbXE0Tpy (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2007 15:45:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751316AbXE0Tpn (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2007 15:45:43 -0400 Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:42904 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994AbXE0Tpm (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2007 15:45:42 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Maximilian Engelhardt Subject: Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:45:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "linux-kernel" , "linux-wireless" , Stephen Hemminger , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jeff Garzik , Gary Zambrano , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton References: <20070525172431.60affaca@freepuppy> <200705261901.18110.mb@bu3sch.de> <200705272125.25506.maxi@daemonizer.de> In-Reply-To: <200705272125.25506.maxi@daemonizer.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705272145.00796.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2095 Lines: 53 On Sunday 27 May 2007 21:25:17 Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > 2.6.22-rc3: > > [ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 46557 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001 > [ 5] 0.0-60.4 sec 58.9 MBytes 8.18 Mbits/sec > [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 51633 > [ 4] 0.0-63.1 sec 7.27 MBytes 967 Kbits/sec Why do we have two different measurements here? Is one TX and one RX? Which one? > koala:~# ping -c10 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.243 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.234 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.235 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.230 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.317 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.232 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.232 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.228 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms > > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8997ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.228/0.242/0.317/0.031 ms > > System responsiveness was the same as with 2.6.21.1. > > wget got 11.23M/s, again same as 2.6.21.1. > > > 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: > > [ 5] local 192.168.1.2 port 42198 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001 > [ 5] 0.0-60.1 sec 402 MBytes 56.1 Mbits/sec > [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 48598 > [ 4] 0.0-63.0 sec 177 MBytes 23.6 Mbits/sec So with -mm (with ssb) you actually get better performace then with plain 2.6.22-rc3? Can you elaborate a bit more about what you get an what you expect on which kernel? -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/