Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220628032439.3314451-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wiGMNvKaVuSDD7y2JeK+NsNyXtqZEusOLmEw9uE+0ZySg@mail.gmail.com> <20220628172321.gbgfif7zgz5ny3mo@moria.home.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20220628172321.gbgfif7zgz5ny3mo@moria.home.lan>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:29:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whTGmf5=f1JdzK22Jw88veKxB2YHbxL0Sgy9EQzMs_MBA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5whatever, now with typechecking] vsprintf: %pf(%p)
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:23 AM Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  - We need to be able to specify the pretty-printer function, and not just have
>    one per type

I even showed you how toi do that, you just deleted it.

Anyway, I'm done with this discussion. I think this is all pointless.
I think you are making things worse, you are making things more
complex, and I don't think this is a direction we want to take things
in.

              Linus