Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760140AbXE1Grv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 02:47:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753004AbXE1Gro (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 02:47:44 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:37779 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750992AbXE1Grn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 02:47:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 12:25:50 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Satoru Takeuchi Cc: Linux Kernel , Rusty Russell , Zwane Mwaikambo , Nathan Lynch , Joel Schopp , Ashok Raj , Heiko Carstens , Gautham R Shenoy , akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Dipankar Subject: Re: CPU hotplug: system hang on CPU hot remove during `pfmon --system-wide' Message-ID: <20070528065550.GL6157@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <87bqg5emqk.wl%takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bqg5emqk.wl%takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 746 Lines: 20 On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:54:43AM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > Since I'm investigating this problem now, I'm glad if someone > reports the test result on other arch or freezer. I suspect the freezer based approach will not have this problem. Gautham could probably verify that. Andrew/Linus, So is it settled now on what approach we are going to follow (freezer vs lock based) for cpu hotplug? I thought that Linus was not favouring freezer based approach sometime back .. -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/