Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   jie1zhan <jesse.zhang@amd.com>
To:     <broonie@kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
CC:     <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>, <Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com>,
        <Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com>, <ajitkumar.pandey@amd.com>,
        jie1zhan <jesse.zhang@amd.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>,
        "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] Fix: SYNCOBJ TIMELINE Test failed.
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:02:36 +0800
Message-ID: <20220629060236.3283445-1-jesse.zhang@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2022 06:02:49.7142
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9f8096e2-bdd3-4ebc-fc22-08da59951234
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6NAM11FT044.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR12MB1459
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
        RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
        autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

 The issue cause by the commit :

721255b527(drm/syncobj: flatten dma_fence_chains on transfer).

Because it use the point of dma_fence incorrectly

Correct the point of dma_fence by fence array

Signed-off-by: jie1zhan <jesse.zhang@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
index 7e48dcd1bee4..d5db818f1c76 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static int drm_syncobj_flatten_chain(struct dma_fence **f)
 		goto free_fences;
 
 	dma_fence_put(*f);
-	*f = &array->base;
+	*f = array->fences[0];
 	return 0;
 
 free_fences:
-- 
2.25.1