Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760959AbXE1JJG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 05:09:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752976AbXE1JI4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 05:08:56 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243]:5567 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751604AbXE1JIz (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 05:08:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oHXUfEL92EQm2my+hDTQyrnxEhsdRfLxaXtbNlRMGMFC/kax0B0akhR7pkFu3U44b64A8Rlixv22bJaHihL63obKxz8GyQKCWChfJK5elONboBv9Xy7v3kdvNyM5K5NWLgf0xeUYVah4R7sn45BoqOsLxOG896YwSeSlaqnowRM= Message-ID: <4cefeab80705280208v2cfdd420u82f1d3b157abb6e0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:38:54 +0530 From: "Nitin Gupta" To: "Daniel Hazelton" Subject: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 4 Cc: "Satyam Sharma" , "Richard Purdie" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm-cc@laptop.org, "Andrew Morton" , "Andrey Panin" , "Bret Towe" , "Michael-Luke Jones" In-Reply-To: <200705280443.56152.dhazelton@enter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4cefeab80705250445m51736a9aj8c89af893d8c242c@mail.gmail.com> <200705280418.07538.dhazelton@enter.net> <4cefeab80705280137v178a449fl391b99b6804a75f2@mail.gmail.com> <200705280443.56152.dhazelton@enter.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1144 Lines: 37 On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton wrote: > On Monday 28 May 2007 04:37:04 Nitin Gupta wrote: > > On 5/28/07, Daniel Hazelton wrote: > > > > As you mentioned in your mail, you are using lzo1x_1_11_compress() > > which is slower than what I ported (which is same as what is exported > > by miniLZO). So, can you please test with the version ported - this > > is found in lzo/src/lzo1x_1.c (or in minilzo.c). > > Also, can you please use 'take 5' for your next testing? > > > > Thanks, > > Nitin > > Will do. (that's DBITS=15, correct?) > That's D_BITS=14 > However, when I averaged it 100 times, lzo1x_1_11_compress() showed better > speed than your implementation - about 1.5% faster. I don't yet have any explanation for this. > The *unsafe* > decompressor, however, only shows about a 1.2% speed advantage over the safe > decompressor. > > DRH > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/