Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <1072cb84-4097-0cbd-f980-a864ea851b0c@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:00:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1
 alignment
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
        amitk@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, rafael@kernel.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
        sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
        matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220622145802.13032-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
 <be793e51-0d89-7afd-e122-ec929a1130e9@arm.com>
 <20220629095302.bi3xx6yicsnjeff7@vireshk-i7>
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220629095302.bi3xx6yicsnjeff7@vireshk-i7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Viresh,

On 6/29/22 10:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 29-06-22, 10:49, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> I would like to move forward with the micro-Watts in
>> the Energy Model. We have feedback from our partners
>> that this is a limitation. Also, as you can see
>> this uW is part of the new SCMI spec, which we
>> have support on our roadmap.
> 
> Should I pick them and merge via PM tree ?
> 

Thanks for fast response. It would be great.

I have 2 ACKs from Sudeep for the SCMI part,
but I don't know the status e.g. of DTPM
current work which is using the EM milli-Watts
and does conversion to uW internally.
I hope, I won't make issues to Daniel's work with this
change.