Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:23:02 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
        amitk@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, rafael@kernel.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, nm@ti.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
        sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
        matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1
 alignment
Message-ID: <20220629095302.bi3xx6yicsnjeff7@vireshk-i7>
References: <20220622145802.13032-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
 <be793e51-0d89-7afd-e122-ec929a1130e9@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <be793e51-0d89-7afd-e122-ec929a1130e9@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 29-06-22, 10:49, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> I would like to move forward with the micro-Watts in
> the Energy Model. We have feedback from our partners
> that this is a limitation. Also, as you can see
> this uW is part of the new SCMI spec, which we
> have support on our roadmap.

Should I pick them and merge via PM tree ?

-- 
viresh