Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <094a0d4e1c1b40f51ce7bec42e410500265d7a6d.camel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 7/8] clk: baikal-t1: Add DDR/PCIe directly
 controlled resets support
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:16:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20220624141853.7417-8-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
References: <20220624141853.7417-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
         <20220624141853.7417-8-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

Hi Serge,

On Fr, 2022-06-24 at 17:18 +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Aside with a set of the trigger-like resets Baikal-T1 CCU provides two
> additional blocks with directly controlled reset signals. In particular it
> concerns DDR full and initial resets and various PCIe sub-domains resets.
> Let's add the direct reset assertion/de-assertion of the corresponding
> flags support into the Baikal-T1 CCU driver then. It will be required at
> least for the PCIe platform driver. Obviously the DDR controller isn't
> supposed to be fully reset in the kernel, so the corresponding controls
> are added just for the sake of the interface implementation completeness.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>

This looks good to me, the issues with the previous patch still apply.

[...]
> +static int ccu_rst_set(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> +		       unsigned long idx, bool high)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_rst *rst;
> +
> +	rst = ccu_rst_get_desc(rcdev, idx);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rst)) {
> +		pr_err("Invalid reset index %lu specified\n", idx);
> +		return PTR_ERR(rst);
> +	}

e.g. this should not be necessary.

regards
Philipp