Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755343AbXE1KoT (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 06:44:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757668AbXE1KoA (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 06:44:00 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:33003 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757431AbXE1Kn6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 06:43:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: fix sched_clock() From: Rusty Russell To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Satyam Sharma , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20070525110543.GM8094@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20070525075446.GA20140@elte.hu> <20070525080209.GE8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525080415.GB21446@elte.hu> <20070525082018.GF8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525083430.GB27236@elte.hu> <20070525084109.GI8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525084426.GA29973@elte.hu> <20070525084547.GJ8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525015544.bce3cb99.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070525090315.GK8094@one.firstfloor.org> <20070525110543.GM8094@one.firstfloor.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:12:47 +1000 Message-Id: <1180321967.29566.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1333 Lines: 38 On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 13:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:03:15AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > This? I sent it to you earlier this week: > > > > Sorry haven't processed those yet. > > > > Ah. The correct fix here is to clear the tsc flag in boot_cpu_data > > when the option is set. Will do that. > > Hmm I double checked this now; tsc_disable indeed clears > X86_FEATURE_TSC in identify_cpu and that should be always > called before anything sched_clock related runs on a CPU. Yes, agreed. > Also the only possibly faulting division is protected > by a cpu_has_tsc which even checks boot_cpu_data. this means > even if the resync frequency code was called for > some reason before the identify_cpu of a AP it should > still work. For the BP this definitely cannot happen. > > I also tried it with qemu myself (both one and two cpus) and it worked > > Rusty, was this really on a standard kernel? Was it with multiple > CPUs? No, will re-check. Drop it for now, if I can reproduce I'll produce the real fix or a decent explanation. Thanks, Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/