Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757747AbXE1OKs (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 10:10:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753071AbXE1OKi (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 10:10:38 -0400 Received: from daemonizer.de ([87.230.16.230]:33682 "EHLO daemonizer.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779AbXE1OKf (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 10:10:35 -0400 From: Maximilian Engelhardt To: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:09:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "linux-kernel" , "linux-wireless" , Stephen Hemminger , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jeff Garzik , Gary Zambrano , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton References: <20070525172431.60affaca@freepuppy> <200705280240.17910.maxi@daemonizer.de> <200705281216.51690.mb@bu3sch.de> In-Reply-To: <200705281216.51690.mb@bu3sch.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2680567.p56DHj8tbN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200705281609.49859.maxi@daemonizer.de> X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Spam-Report: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7-deb * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2656 Lines: 87 --nextPart2680567.p56DHj8tbN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote: > Can you give 2.6.16 a try? The diff is not that big and we might > be able to find out what broke if you find out 2.6.16 works. > You can also try later kernels like .17, .18, .19 to further > reduce the patch. (You could also git-bisect, if you have the time). > I did some testing and compiled some kernels and here are the results: I was able to find out what causes the problems for me. I did build two=20 2.6.21.3 kernels, and one does work fine and the other doesn't. This is a diff of the kernel configs I used: =2D-- /usr/src/linux-2.6.21.3-oldconfig1/.config 2007-05-28 13:41:15.00000= 0000=20 +0200 +++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.21.3/.config 2007-05-28 14:46:08.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.21.3 =2D# Mon May 28 13:41:15 2007 +# Mon May 28 14:46:09 2007 # CONFIG_X86_32=3Dy CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=3Dy @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ # # General setup # =2DCONFIG_LOCALVERSION=3D"-oldconfig1" +CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=3D"" CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO=3Dy CONFIG_SWAP=3Dy CONFIG_SYSVIPC=3Dy @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ # # Processor type and features # =2D# CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT is not set +CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=3Dy # CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set =2D# CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is not set +CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=3Dy # CONFIG_SMP is not set CONFIG_X86_PC=3Dy # CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set The -oldconfig1 is the kernel that had no problems and the other shows the = b44=20 problem. So if High Resolution Timer Support is disabled everything works=20 fine and if I enable it the problems do appear again. I didn't test this on my 2.6.22-rc3 kernel yet, but I guess disabling High= =20 Resolution Timer Support will also solve the problem there. The older kernels I tried also work perfectly fine and they didn't have the= =20 High Resolution Timer Support yet. Maxi --nextPart2680567.p56DHj8tbN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGWuKtOimwv528XGERAtQ1AKCFy7ttCAxrsBSsWI4oPFp0Gplw/ACg+PAd xraG3X/P9xk/wJpOGllhhbc= =07ZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2680567.p56DHj8tbN-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/