Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:39:39 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header.
Message-ID: <20070528143939.GA16026@suse.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <m1slah6gm0.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> <200704301717.08230.ak@suse.de> <20070501035539.GA15472@in.ibm.com> <m14pmx18ey.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> <20070501050657.GA23111@in.ibm.com> <20070528105442.GA25599@suse.de> <20070528110944.GE32045@in.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070528110944.GE32045@in.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 842
Lines: 22

* Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> [2007-05-28 13:09]:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> [2007-05-01 07:06]:
> > > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a
> > > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there.
> > 
> > What's the state of it? Andy, was the GDB breakage the reason why you
> > didn't merge it? Did someone file a GDB bug?
> 
> I had sent a mail to gdb mailing list but no response. Did not raise
> a bug though.

BTW: Did anyone test with GDB 6.6?


Thanks,
   Bernhard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/