Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp773976iog; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:53:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uHtj7A9ncL/WZmxEcPVaXImszLh47kVJN/TtXFmOyMr57/5oCIQa3BbW1yb1n57am5XelA X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d9c3:0:b0:435:bb08:9ada with SMTP id v3-20020aa7d9c3000000b00435bb089adamr12759930eds.171.1656607987414; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:53:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656607987; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C13WMjqe6e7Mxr6fc/WWENyP3labgDZn4W+o9Zw/xYdEu+80ZW3EbcxZq9I6h4ST5u uEJjk1yyAiv4ZOiXCpIcTrJu6e3/vGHgdugZI7wV+q2vYWnddchDP0pqxGneFnAnBZ+I bWIqhMTc8V7s++WVWTdP2euXPhK2yUNerVr9kF7XcZkoXBJ0leFX6+gOKFLjngTAnPRt xtDXYzPlaE4nGZtGUFfx5RYNCMakq5GrfoGIgW0/ZFTNpyl1VfZ3R1jkmd9mluHIl0qD atkRFGgT0ePxssLFH8hDzcvw6ZNlTi3uKbAKCMeT9EvZ6kTiLpGYWGgt9cHOulEPUUQL WsaA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Rd3tOeUYojzaKZQVFwQ8gQjjShmoCGZbxxiW6Nm6XmE=; b=0gG+ydqXliXvlduF/TQvjCvsAWjLBaogLus8oIKbMSSfa+dGDQnuqnAo1MAgTRrLLQ XyE28+cpGra9yOH2DMW0HSK64UcIRgZxjO77eF+wkvfngYdg33XtQdtSL9NFjnnVpwVa HDpZ2LE7hR3rWY/SisvXTx720nB3DyQ3M+bNJQE8Hbf2ASZio1ju7+eIIKZL2A1y+jnf +5rAVaOrMSJxD3bxE+LS27Rzx6gOa2AhipB10MXfCtdw5ALkZ2jcngUs5lp767SFCGmz SCuenFcDpmia1C8uqKtgZ5KIv5Z0cgAqs6wi1hpURNQgZKnwJC0Qgk6LXWYLbJ/4FfIK AKqA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=DycnMdeG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f19-20020a056402069300b00435a08a355dsi21476433edy.404.2022.06.30.09.52.39; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=DycnMdeG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236074AbiF3Ql2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:41:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47186 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235650AbiF3QlZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:41:25 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F0573BF9D for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1620B82CA5 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86F75C34115; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:41:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1656607281; bh=ev6m0HEqUfBk0KtPeLEWeeZgRImhdnSbcXBGFSJGIBg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DycnMdeGHIKZwepj6prIMTGVWkiCpxyYzcsIiiDi+GeqZ3mvtdW9ogr6cRIIIpUjR J81ZY1Wgjxmxf91xtAPfrWcUattOq5sffRAwVSXqug2ohEVOwkbOUcU7WfcE8WxswT +ChwLe9E9z3gNNysB623lzZOBCF30eQEjy05aYKQm+amsF0s7pMcn1ef4S3/gwXJEx ca8lT/ZjcEIJDI7GitJG+AZfiPlsGf9oAzjhERYJoDjwhllZUTpWA4AEnVmngXz4w2 vBN62HxhjYzg8fiVTvEDeOLUCHdQdJ8mIFV/u0mSy0vwBv8oSA3socBFg1Pkgx5xD3 HSsCPyu7QuiVQ== Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 351225C04B3; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:41:21 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Neeraj Upadhyay Cc: frederic@kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhangfei.gao@foxmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, urezki@gmail.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com, maz@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] srcu: Reduce blocking agressiveness of expedited grace periods further Message-ID: <20220630164121.GX1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <20220630041201.18301-1-quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20220630041201.18301-1-quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 09:42:01AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote: > Commit 640a7d37c3f4 ("srcu: Block less aggressively for expedited > grace periods") highlights a problem where aggressively blocking > SRCU expedited grace periods, as was introduced in commit > 282d8998e997 ("srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers > from consuming CPU"), introduces ~2 minutes delay to the overall > ~3.5 minutes boot time, when starting VMs with "-bios QEMU_EFI.fd" > cmdline on qemu, which results in very high rate of memslots > add/remove, which causes > ~6000 synchronize_srcu() calls for > kvm->srcu SRCU instance. > > Below table captures the experiments done by Zhangfei Gao and Shameer > to measure the boottime impact with various values of non-sleeping > per phase counts, with HZ_250 and preemption enabled: > > +──────────────────────────+────────────────+ > | SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE | Boot time (s) | > +──────────────────────────+────────────────+ > | 100 | 30.053 | > | 150 | 25.151 | > | 200 | 20.704 | > | 250 | 15.748 | > | 500 | 11.401 | > | 1000 | 11.443 | > | 10000 | 11.258 | > | 1000000 | 11.154 | > +──────────────────────────+────────────────+ > > Analysis on the experiment results showed improved boot time > with non blocking delays close to one jiffy duration. This > was also seen when number of per-phase iterations were scaled > to one jiffy. > > So, this change scales per-grace-period phase number of non-sleeping > polls, such that, non-sleeping polls are done for one jiffy. In addition > to this, srcu_get_delay() call in srcu_gp_end(), which is used to calculate > the delay used for scheduling callbacks, is replaced with the check for > expedited grace period. This is done, to schedule cbs for completed expedited > grace periods immediately, which results in improved boot time seen in > experiments. > > In addition to the changes to default per phase delays, this change > adds 3 new kernel parameters - srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay, > srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay_phase, srcutree.srcu_retry_check_delay. > This allows users to configure the srcu grace period scanning delays, > depending on their system configuration requirements. > > Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay > Tested-by: Marc Zyngier Looks like great progress, thank you! I look forward to seeing the next version. In the meantime, I have queued this one on the experimental branch quic_neeraju.2022.06.30a for further testing. Thanx, Paul > --- > > Change in v2: > > - Change srcu_max_nodelay default value to consider phase delay > iterations > - Apply Pauls' feedback > - Add Marc's Tested-by > > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 18 ++++ > kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 82 ++++++++++++++----- > 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > index af647714c113..7e34086c64f5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > @@ -5805,6 +5805,24 @@ > expediting. Set to zero to disable automatic > expediting. > > + srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay [KNL] > + Specifies the number of no-delay instances > + per jiffy for which the SRCU grace period > + worker thread will be rescheduled with zero > + delay. Beyond this limit, worker thread will > + be rescheduled with a sleep delay of one jiffy. > + > + srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay_phase [KNL] > + Specifies the per-grace-period phase, number of > + non-sleeping polls of readers. Beyond this limit, > + grace period worker thread will be rescheduled > + with a sleep delay of one jiffy, between each > + rescan of the readers, for a grace period phase. > + > + srcutree.srcu_retry_check_delay [KNL] > + Specifies number of microseconds of non-sleeping > + delay between each non-sleeping poll of readers. > + > srcutree.small_contention_lim [KNL] > Specifies the number of update-side contention > events per jiffy will be tolerated before > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > index 0db7873f4e95..1c304fec89c0 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > @@ -511,10 +511,52 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *ssp) > return sum; > } > > -#define SRCU_INTERVAL 1 // Base delay if no expedited GPs pending. > -#define SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL 10 // Maximum incremental delay from slow readers. > -#define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE 3 // Maximum per-GP-phase consecutive no-delay instances. > -#define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY 100 // Maximum consecutive no-delay instances. > +/* > + * We use an adaptive strategy for synchronize_srcu() and especially for > + * synchronize_srcu_expedited(). We spin for a fixed time period > + * (defined below, boot time configurable) to allow SRCU readers to exit > + * their read-side critical sections. If there are still some readers > + * after one jiffy, we repeatedly block for one jiffy time periods. > + * The blocking time is increased as the grace-period age increases, > + * with max blocking time capped at 10 jiffies. > + */ > +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY 5 > + > +static ulong srcu_retry_check_delay = SRCU_DEFAULT_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY; > +module_param(srcu_retry_check_delay, ulong, 0444); > + > +#define SRCU_INTERVAL 1 // Base delay if no expedited GPs pending. > +#define SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL 10 // Maximum incremental delay from slow readers. > + > +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_LO 3UL // Lowmark on default per-GP-phase > + // no-delay instances. > +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_HI 1000UL // Highmark on default per-GP-phase > + // no-delay instances. > + > +#define SRCU_UL_CLAMP_LO(val, low) ((val) > (low) ? (val) : (low)) > +#define SRCU_UL_CLAMP_HI(val, high) ((val) < (high) ? (val) : (high)) > +#define SRCU_UL_CLAMP(val, low, high) SRCU_UL_CLAMP_HI(SRCU_UL_CLAMP_LO((val), (low)), (high)) > +// per-GP-phase no-delay instances adjusted to allow non-sleeping poll upto > +// one jiffies time duration. Mult by 2 is done to factor in the srcu_get_delay() > +// called from process_srcu(). > +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_ADJUSTED \ > + (2UL * USEC_PER_SEC / HZ / SRCU_DEFAULT_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY) > + > +// Maximum per-GP-phase consecutive no-delay instances. > +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE \ > + SRCU_UL_CLAMP(SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_ADJUSTED, \ > + SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_LO, \ > + SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_HI) > + > +static ulong srcu_max_nodelay_phase = SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE; > +module_param(srcu_max_nodelay_phase, ulong, 0444); > + > +// Maximum consecutive no-delay instances. > +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY (SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE > 100 ? \ > + SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE : 100) > + > +static ulong srcu_max_nodelay = SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY; > +module_param(srcu_max_nodelay, ulong, 0444); > > /* > * Return grace-period delay, zero if there are expedited grace > @@ -535,7 +577,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_get_delay(struct srcu_struct *ssp) > jbase += j - gpstart; > if (!jbase) { > WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay, READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) + 1); > - if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) > SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE) > + if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) > srcu_max_nodelay_phase) > jbase = 1; > } > } > @@ -612,15 +654,6 @@ void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock); > > -/* > - * We use an adaptive strategy for synchronize_srcu() and especially for > - * synchronize_srcu_expedited(). We spin for a fixed time period > - * (defined below) to allow SRCU readers to exit their read-side critical > - * sections. If there are still some readers after a few microseconds, > - * we repeatedly block for 1-millisecond time periods. > - */ > -#define SRCU_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY 5 > - > /* > * Start an SRCU grace period. > */ > @@ -706,7 +739,7 @@ static void srcu_schedule_cbs_snp(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_node *snp > */ > static void srcu_gp_end(struct srcu_struct *ssp) > { > - unsigned long cbdelay; > + unsigned long cbdelay = 1; > bool cbs; > bool last_lvl; > int cpu; > @@ -726,7 +759,9 @@ static void srcu_gp_end(struct srcu_struct *ssp) > spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(ssp); > idx = rcu_seq_state(ssp->srcu_gp_seq); > WARN_ON_ONCE(idx != SRCU_STATE_SCAN2); > - cbdelay = !!srcu_get_delay(ssp); > + if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq), READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp))) > + cbdelay = 0; > + > WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_last_gp_end, ktime_get_mono_fast_ns()); > rcu_seq_end(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq); > gpseq = rcu_seq_current(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq); > @@ -927,12 +962,16 @@ static void srcu_funnel_gp_start(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_data *sdp, > */ > static bool try_check_zero(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, int trycount) > { > + unsigned long curdelay; > + > + curdelay = !srcu_get_delay(ssp); > + > for (;;) { > if (srcu_readers_active_idx_check(ssp, idx)) > return true; > - if (--trycount + !srcu_get_delay(ssp) <= 0) > + if ((--trycount + curdelay) <= 0) > return false; > - udelay(SRCU_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY); > + udelay(srcu_retry_check_delay); > } > } > > @@ -1588,7 +1627,7 @@ static void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work) > j = jiffies; > if (READ_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_jiffies) == j) { > WRITE_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count, READ_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count) + 1); > - if (READ_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count) > SRCU_MAX_NODELAY) > + if (READ_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count) > srcu_max_nodelay) > curdelay = 1; > } else { > WRITE_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count, 1); > @@ -1680,6 +1719,11 @@ static int __init srcu_bootup_announce(void) > pr_info("Hierarchical SRCU implementation.\n"); > if (exp_holdoff != DEFAULT_SRCU_EXP_HOLDOFF) > pr_info("\tNon-default auto-expedite holdoff of %lu ns.\n", exp_holdoff); > + if (srcu_retry_check_delay != SRCU_DEFAULT_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY) > + pr_info("\tNon-default retry check delay of %lu us.\n", srcu_retry_check_delay); > + if (srcu_max_nodelay != SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY) > + pr_info("\tNon-default max no-delay of %lu.\n", srcu_max_nodelay); > + pr_info("\tMax phase no-delay instances is %lu.\n", srcu_max_nodelay_phase); > return 0; > } > early_initcall(srcu_bootup_announce); > -- > 2.17.1 >