Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762771AbXE1VhE (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 17:37:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751505AbXE1Vg4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 17:36:56 -0400 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:32797 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752011AbXE1Vgz (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2007 17:36:55 -0400 Message-ID: <465B4B75.2040602@tmr.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:36:53 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen Organization: TMR Associates Inc, Schenectady NY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061105 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel mailing List Subject: What causes iowait other than waiting for i/o? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1057 Lines: 23 I recently noted that my system was spending a lot of time in i/o wait when doing some tasks which I thought didn't involve i/o, as noted by the lack of disk light activity most of the time. I thought of network, certainly the NIC had no activity for this job. So I set up a little loop to capture all disk i/o and network activity (including loopback). That was no obvious help, and the program doesn't use pipes. At this point I'm really curious, does someone have a good clue? Note: I don't think this is a bug or performance issue, unless the kernel is doing something and charging time to iowait instead of system I don't see anything to fix, but I would like to understand. -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/