Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <d5cc413d-d32a-5612-fe7a-95b61892c363@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:03:28 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] [PATCH] fscache: Fix if condition in
 fscache_wait_on_volume_collision()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>, dhowells@redhat.com,
        linux-cachefs@redhat.com
Cc:     zhangwen@coolpad.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        zbestahu@gmail.com
References: <20220525023212.32642-1-huyue2@coolpad.com>
From:   JeffleXu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220525023212.32642-1-huyue2@coolpad.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 5/25/22 10:32 AM, Yue Hu wrote:
> After waiting for the volume to complete the acquisition with timeout,
> the if condition under which potential volume collision occurs should be
> acquire the volume is still pending rather than not pending so that we
> will continue to wait until the pending flag is cleared. Also, use the
> existing test pending wrapper directly instead of test_bit().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
> ---
>  fs/fscache/volume.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fscache/volume.c b/fs/fscache/volume.c
> index 71d3a6d6d72c..f2009cc22002 100644
> --- a/fs/fscache/volume.c
> +++ b/fs/fscache/volume.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(struct fscache_volume *candidate,
>  {
>  	wait_var_event_timeout(&candidate->flags,
>  			       !fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate), 20 * HZ);
> -	if (!fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate)) {
> +	if (fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate)) {
>  		pr_notice("Potential volume collision new=%08x old=%08x",
>  			  candidate->debug_id, collidee_debug_id);
>  		fscache_stat(&fscache_n_volumes_collision);

Yeah, I also noticed that before.


> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static bool fscache_hash_volume(struct fscache_volume *candidate)
>  	hlist_bl_add_head(&candidate->hash_link, h);
>  	hlist_bl_unlock(h);
>  
> -	if (test_bit(FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING, &candidate->flags))
> +	if (fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate))
>  		fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(candidate, collidee_debug_id);
>  	return true;
>  

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>

-- 
Thanks,
Jeffle