Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220613054310.21186-1-a-govindraju@ti.com> <CACRpkdZB1T1cKQcNDiriCdeQuHGMH-9BvV=a9mP21YENThA-bQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMRc=MfB2hNB+vbs4BXbV-StDyA++yoQP9HDBbMTx2JWJ9KRyA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MfB2hNB+vbs4BXbV-StDyA++yoQP9HDBbMTx2JWJ9KRyA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:13:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaOtXJ09pY5rS-AaEXXfLjKkiZ-h1n5+gNMO99kxo5wiw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: davinci: Add support for system suspend/resume PM
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
        Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 12:28 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 3:52 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 7:43 AM Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
> > >
> > > Add support for system suspend/resume PM hooks, save the
> > > register context of all the required gpio registers on suspend
> > > and restore context on the resume.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com>
> >
> > Hijacking thread!
> >
> > Aswath, if you are testing DaVinci boards can you look at these two
> > patches:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220507124536.171930-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220507124536.171930-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org/
> >
> > I resend them every new kernel release but they never get merged :D
> >
> > If you can test them, maybe I can queue them directly for the SoC
> > tree.
>
> Sekhar: do you still maintain DaVinci platforms? If so - could you
> take these patches through yourtree?

We concluded in parallell discussions that DM644x and DM646x are
unused as far as we can tell so I just sent patches to delete these
board files, that should do it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij