Received: by 2002:ac0:c50a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y10csp1231663imi; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 05:56:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vlAEsCp+OzL9v/ZDny1aJvjC/1BZYMqgjhjsdJBXswZtDZNWjP2QR+MFlZjrMbK89VHdRv X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:dac5:b0:16a:7560:2ad1 with SMTP id q5-20020a170902dac500b0016a75602ad1mr20291842plx.168.1656680166225; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 05:56:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656680166; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=B30VJtyPkwyNbgmkrl1PegOXzAuwUrAnwncimhWHzK1Q+lGKCBlJ8r1OvUBk/Z31HP rwb8mkMOraO3ow12D9QI2tGTg7GgLI9Ju54APtcj9E5r73so3Icm7p/FezPfChkDX1/O grsZeIiKachKXe6AiFF/nmj6sWhWYvTkugDqQ1c6Ki0tRpPAPOLcIC6xSuaVjxR+GIV3 1OApN85aKCf5G6oya+4NsPmhHpW1FG2Po55qxaNFuFtWpRj0FlIeo9NfcsOmh8+5YeCY 05EnU66SqWa5f3wfqv/MvCrAvI7DaMw5nJ3Xp9QZXuZRTPxhFAY66ekgalMBKvp08TCD SVJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=9fESupLsVibFBT9Jshx7sx492QNW1uXVHiFs4UY6jdo=; b=x7L18aRtTGjbb6AcfP/yYgXDWyw02ythLgttR6qjYbBIwRzzfQrWkkRAosk93lM4CQ vaQ/COxZ1XPMyhAj6+wBK6rKmeM2CHRypcJX9R9EkhgLvFM8mA5mzy1FrfRbWK4n2tgJ leEpEHv6+Ua+RiUuUNK95PYUDada2etSYXVEhidnXP/gWM1iUmu1+cC1JPkkmo6RwsHB VzHNnaToRFU7efjsu1LppW0EwaUWaoNVBLK96i6vfdjXjR07CkZlbtH4bz4Vrh9E15Wz GKC0KmvHjuYRKmBkbp8W15bdwN5xl7AxUEbByR6lNM5JbIK37b1xQoy7RJG6OXBAjYVC +0Jg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=B5NGKiRm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l21-20020a170902d35500b0015f3d889431si2332625plk.446.2022.07.01.05.55.31; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 05:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=B5NGKiRm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236254AbiGAMpL (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:45:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43142 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236215AbiGAMpJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:45:09 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com (mail-oi1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B745533EB4; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 05:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id l81so3337472oif.9; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 05:45:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9fESupLsVibFBT9Jshx7sx492QNW1uXVHiFs4UY6jdo=; b=B5NGKiRmAEpLNLEvQvABrUY2mlRFTJIghKa0CmaEprTgUg8P/bMLjDlC9kqySWbxX3 WbtV6Ly41oBeo7+bnVMbiOCtsCj+s21zCMaKWHKIFpxWvbGvSRgkZytYo2CDJHWX7CQy H0Lo4IVoOLp0brhFmh1VLK5kNnbeepwvvprEWGPfumaQIQrTiQQpS1U3eI8UUCyg5qNj rgDb2Uz9eLivrzgiR8dVP7NnivyIN7GwoT1+hvhiT42KM1qYWy4gvv0dLWk3Bk9eqgfm vR0MqGdvIWq1A1Yz9vzd5RFkRMmaDB1AviyZo68aMlrOWiSCDjzcIXUTQ31msC+JBIbK jC6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9fESupLsVibFBT9Jshx7sx492QNW1uXVHiFs4UY6jdo=; b=RtRLlPWyj3U/tlpw3Sz/bZ18Rx4FJnhzZwvTHLYx7AiQudjsXkpDMP3oOXLgTFD7IK wQs2NcDoIz2sOEv/xOAy/BGL8bMKobMbIDPz9fjMS3sZf+g8H3vVnzqYFszLMhP/cIJA xU5fvGAaZT4KsbH9w8m7ED6MtdakBlB1Cw00g/AZxTq1IyIAm8qWRbeCpjH8WpVsvMda ONnn+oTtpI8BICbroZuKIYtoIJU3/+ARr+A2mr0RE7GT920p19RlhNyuOxOAr/fWve+p RAj9vEuSg0Rf/1hrjBXcXxNBlQMPn2DLKxOc4AskmYDkqBiKXMqoh2ipBKNZq692uhNY K3NA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9uuE48gTxHrdkLlqS2sUlwQzVB2l7uT/nxyTE8XClkkWN3W7Lj 392DULjbvSTfRZZc4Tiz2O78NGbO1Tk0HXUW/AGtRUfJTQ2sOA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:30a8:b0:335:afc9:4a2c with SMTP id bl40-20020a05680830a800b00335afc94a2cmr7811673oib.288.1656679505945; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 05:45:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220630022317.15734-1-gch981213@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Chuanhong Guo Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 20:44:54 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ACPI: skip IRQ1 override on 3 Ryzen 6000 laptops To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Limonciello, Mario" Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Tighe Donnelly , Kent Hou Man , Len Brown , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 4:12 AM Limonciello, Mario wrote: > However I do want to point out that Windows doesn't care about legacy > format or not. This bug where keyboard doesn't work only popped up on > Linux. > > Given the number of systems with the bug is appearing to grow I wonder > if the right answer is actually a new heuristic that doesn't apply the > kernel override for polarity inversion anymore. Maybe if the system is > 2022 or newer? Or on the ACPI version? The previous attempt to limit the scope of IRQ override ends up breaking some other buggy devices: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20210728151958.15205-1-hui.wang@canonical.com/ It's unfortunate that the original author of this IRQ override doesn't limit the scope to their exact devices. Hi, Rafael! What do you think? should we skip this IRQ override one-by-one or add a different matching logic to check the bios date instead? -- Regards, Chuanhong Guo