Received: by 2002:ac0:cd04:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp13954imn; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:57:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vgI/kXYOLTSGGxR16uPDaU/6rqOFay0/Zm6yfCDIWsqfARL9VnHZYuuakpCE5A4axOFcn3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4752:b0:726:9e6b:7fb0 with SMTP id j18-20020a170906475200b007269e6b7fb0mr14706867ejs.747.1656691055947; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 08:57:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656691055; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j6kZYyJQC0RlRe5JiyTzacFvcp2aobie8BxhbOsf4Kw8kXCz8CZTpZEJ8E5GryaHH+ 4KTbz2Le7nD/wUrzJz1YkZHBaLaZwivhXac/6Hf6jepY9PqISwMqK+9glMecO2sTCv3r aGuJh3Isda1nLK6XriQ7nJhAvbZOdsVB2LpDlVXpxwZGE7MLyE6iNKJeH5BTDPGOP32r 3TPgo+ThbT893x0oosW47mbE8jKFppnuJaHmchdjEOmWp0+n6vZgNKGNzx1RD9ZOxoHW 6nRHnqEvQViQRyheMTa0dgRoFP9bfZTFPg3YkCvJFYTuhjE8GIx8JmMr6conKTpHymne uSww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=9yv6QUWYDmgQjKt1P93gNeGHmUq3W/So/sIQeZFHIcA=; b=0QfGVa66/1P+PUVWoaUQvGlkRlbNJAUJtOYNZvhj7ryiapeYnDP/pwujE32I1BaoZq w4tpXBhxZ0uxvYjqrUL+W93jVkpIpphq886JkHygKaVNdjVlMSyplA5HvSvGpf5mX9sx jeFX7s1DVXj7EnAeMF9fMc7ijbIXLWFJgG/vt+46MtlBSp/EMz+lNsqla1IF/tX2Pf0K L6/KZ3nto9UJUTASVRbfDY7DyNACJBAJN5nl/G1YEfvLRc6snJuD6YEkF6WKl6pDWp1s sTwFGVP4zHKceNwqwBpNL27GdbgYEnzl2NKMIHlrZvgvB+2kXHGDCQhC0J0C0Rip1Ubc S1WA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=rqzfXCul; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u26-20020a50c2da000000b0042bc9f106dcsi11937339edf.192.2022.07.01.08.56.57; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 08:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=rqzfXCul; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229606AbiGAPrt (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:47:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231405AbiGAPrn (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:47:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C423A737 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id t21so2831972pfq.1 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 08:47:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9yv6QUWYDmgQjKt1P93gNeGHmUq3W/So/sIQeZFHIcA=; b=rqzfXCul7tw0OtYOnP55pVCB7g/W9r+ESLzhXTbbeXFyAb7FsPVhGwWf1o6kj4AEw9 yy5yMHnLr97j5o8rrLFjKXtvNiVn9FBMx+OuaStaeI4VtIuzSQQMCYCKdG/m5/+ZvbtJ mgVJXlM7Ih3nxS4V9lsQKs/m0R9tyRektkxlV6RlzNAGVnt03mZ7EX5LY/pDnGeggzJW 5yhjTlYGbhC7Tjeh7iltQpmTBPc0/ob4Ek3moFpXstDBXYsgrX+l1Ee4H94nhyirr8kt PXIyVeGHxqvtHBp9W92BVREWrxfsXLcvqjppHbdeBuO4CTDShzDE2h5XITLVdfm3eTZi 0t7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9yv6QUWYDmgQjKt1P93gNeGHmUq3W/So/sIQeZFHIcA=; b=BMX5jdC8F6gOhAYl9Ke+HrGk+LhVCnc1eR5SJrknXp3JCbuOc6rDORNxSgDjAfVq4C DrPLJKHACKS2hTL5tqOsINaX6WHXythunRMKymWr8wFMHejPy85rVFCaJbYJKlmHBnu1 ptXossvg30vqdS6p7g5EZpmoBOFu4gm7N4qCQ/cEQ7ekCY1J9xnuzCQgCTX7HK8Dl03t mwgX6bUcB/cq90w060IooWSr6gqVSujB7T2L+BUboZmwPWK5u3nX4MVMPNhinzEjbje4 rEZrQ8OYOsyZqE+j0THw1WOkz2+L0MMJBf0DHiDX2bckdIk1ioiQxeT8papkTODJRZ6E 5ydQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+OqRSgHEi73qEaI8Y+UKxiUP4HpkBiyldDc3HJ5EI8EHA5Ldu4 S8m0q2dYlogIrGhUPW8+/IayeKFghfeuRo4ompnQdw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:3307:b0:527:cbdc:d7dc with SMTP id cq7-20020a056a00330700b00527cbdcd7dcmr19540188pfb.85.1656690460501; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 08:47:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220624070656.GE79500@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20220624144358.lqt2ffjdry6p5u4d@google.com> <20220625023642.GA40868@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20220627023812.GA29314@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20220627123415.GA32052@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20220627144822.GA20878@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20220628034926.GA69004@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20220628034926.GA69004@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> From: Shakeel Butt Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:47:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [net] 4890b686f4: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -69.4% regression To: Feng Tang Cc: Eric Dumazet , Linux MM , Andrew Morton , Roman Gushchin , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Muchun Song , Jakub Kicinski , Xin Long , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , kernel test robot , Soheil Hassas Yeganeh , LKML , network dev , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, MPTCP Upstream , "linux-sctp @ vger . kernel . org" , lkp@lists.01.org, kbuild test robot , Huang Ying , Xing Zhengjun , Yin Fengwei , Ying Xu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:49 PM Feng Tang wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 06:25:59PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 4:48 PM Feng Tang wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I also analyzed the perf-profile data, and made some layout chan= ges > > > which could recover the changes from 69% to 40%. > > > > > > 7c80b038d23e1f4c 4890b686f4088c90432149bd6de 332b589c49656a45881bca4e= cc0 > > > ---------------- --------------------------- ------------------------= --- > > > 15722 -69.5% 4792 -40.8% 9300 = netperf.Throughput_Mbps > > > > > > > I simply did the following and got much better results. > > > > But I am not sure if updates to ->usage are really needed that often... > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.= h > > index 679591301994d316062f92b275efa2459a8349c9..e267be4ba849760117d9fd0= 41e22c2a44658ab36 > > 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/page_counter.h > > +++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h > > @@ -3,12 +3,15 @@ > > #define _LINUX_PAGE_COUNTER_H > > > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > > > struct page_counter { > > - atomic_long_t usage; > > - unsigned long min; > > + /* contended cache line. */ > > + atomic_long_t usage ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; > > + > > + unsigned long min ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; > > unsigned long low; > > unsigned long high; > > unsigned long max; > > @@ -27,12 +30,6 @@ struct page_counter { > > unsigned long watermark; > > unsigned long failcnt; > > > > - /* > > - * 'parent' is placed here to be far from 'usage' to reduce > > - * cache false sharing, as 'usage' is written mostly while > > - * parent is frequently read for cgroup's hierarchical > > - * counting nature. > > - */ > > struct page_counter *parent; > > }; > > I just tested it, it does perform better (the 4th is with your patch), > some perf-profile data is also listed. > > 7c80b038d23e1f4c 4890b686f4088c90432149bd6de 332b589c49656a45881bca4ecc0= e719635902654380b23ffce908d > ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- = --------------------------- > 15722 -69.5% 4792 -40.8% 9300 = -27.9% 11341 netperf.Throughput_Mbps > > 0.00 +0.3 0.26 =C2=B1 5% +0.5 0.51 = +1.3 1.27 =C2=B1 2%pp.self.__sk_mem_raise_allocated > 0.00 +0.3 0.32 =C2=B1 15% +1.7 1.74 = =C2=B1 2% +0.4 0.40 =C2=B1 2% pp.self.propagate_protected_us= age > 0.00 +0.8 0.82 =C2=B1 7% +0.9 0.90 = +0.8 0.84 pp.self.__mod_memcg_state > 0.00 +1.2 1.24 =C2=B1 4% +1.0 1.01 = +1.4 1.44 pp.self.try_charge_memcg > 0.00 +2.1 2.06 +2.1 2.13 = +2.1 2.11 pp.self.page_counter_uncharge > 0.00 +2.1 2.14 =C2=B1 4% +2.7 2.71 = +2.6 2.60 =C2=B1 2% pp.self.page_counter_try_charge > 1.12 =C2=B1 4% +3.1 4.24 +1.1 2.22 = +1.4 2.51 pp.self.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath > 0.28 =C2=B1 9% +3.8 4.06 =C2=B1 4% +0.2 0= .48 +0.4 0.68 pp.self.sctp_eat_data > 0.00 +8.2 8.23 +0.8 0.83 = +1.3 1.26 pp.self.__sk_mem_reduce_allocated > > And the size of 'mem_cgroup' is increased from 4224 Bytes to 4608. Hi Feng, can you please try two more configurations? Take Eric's patch of adding ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp in page_counter and for first increase MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to 64 and for second increase it to 128. Basically batch increases combined with Eric's patch.