Received: by 2002:ac0:cd04:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp50304imn; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 09:42:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uE9+mdVEmAVsYdrhgmtSuH3Soe215VabUMlYyDdVFwzxJ8nCrTFd8VQZMphgnxk034vnPS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b1c1:b0:726:b009:4b63 with SMTP id bv1-20020a170906b1c100b00726b0094b63mr15646432ejb.24.1656693740497; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:42:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656693740; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WpMo2ukgJ0R3OGwkccf4JmU58HjHnsRUESpMQAS1UZEpRQTxE3SsBvBPqMVizWR4Kh znUCR6O+bSnxi6V+Fykr0xYW5dEKvndQix8qdnI3Y25puTkEdf58W6eOTt+7hQslv1kt K3EsWkrQhfV2bWA7RhMyQVvME3xeXdPfEhzdJNXzDaAQyqT+4QoTn1219p77mbhilIX1 NV/A0V2nKiB7jZKoJ/k4UvAYI641hKGaurWskajQnQentSJOUndu+HVQLn05OCesMPJ/ q6B+Vf326uOqu1xJkINRrrufIcTRSPX/6oV9b8gZhL3zy07fn6r97dUQWks+71al6rDp IqZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=5uv2lvhtAwztq7T7UpXT4Rxmu2LZnO2hpEo1Dkg0ThU=; b=z3KRfvaFOk98lCvLw6yCT3oaOjFxhsnzyoUVZksZFGriPIY6xKTgf+lCdD0TT8eYXs EZxffZDol9RSVjamumg8nm7XuGGPUDDiisbSezB6T6ybqOESQzgopams2TnICC5WvI+N eVX10IqckmvuBwTOYqZGv6FHAzNsIRy1yGkhv0lbG4Ld+gEakWYyn2RPzrrguGQpCpez l4pRS+davKqdhq/Fg6vRhSkwFgxP+EbqjPcjxwkz31Nkx2mfBejNuhnn/Mn5HhNxgp1T iCe46iZ+SBjDjYX4TUJdPTWFpZOlsTVI3m/Xyzi4E4+VFBtleeofFjO9AzsS7EB3TjKo poyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=rAeJXjFO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hw8-20020a170907a0c800b00722d8f4431bsi8586438ejc.618.2022.07.01.09.41.55; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=rAeJXjFO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231829AbiGAQbW (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:31:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54664 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231197AbiGAQbV (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:31:21 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC4C3135F; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 261GVJOF024071; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:31:20 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=5uv2lvhtAwztq7T7UpXT4Rxmu2LZnO2hpEo1Dkg0ThU=; b=rAeJXjFOkOZG+ZZq5iOvF2s0Nb7ViCWgAAKH7JCeWDVdyHkSUwo9vrHaNCsOq7A3ezaK GHFmdwsGWxgemCasYpK82KgU3C3JA6KpwT1RhX88H8Rtrkq6f3OjXnViMjAeFfWaxrP2 JTqTMX7U88Xvp58j8szKscMfSy+l61ElywEHOncVxCSNI4/JBCfwPVL+dtVOXf/JtnAK ZWcp2KHlqmOhUh3xzymbR4bx+qg6hdMbilT59NKtAgvyK3GznoG+DvEPE/mTzewP6jRx 3qWYXMGB2g0/kihdDg1yXb/V8KEs/BfKp8UQ0pwKeI2IzybpmzlVY9TVVFMCtrCT71Hx iA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h23gehytc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:31:19 +0000 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 261FMeOC014115; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:21:36 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h23gehysd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:21:36 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 261G77iD010877; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:21:33 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gwt097e5w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:21:33 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 261GLUST20644304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:21:30 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD99A405C; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:21:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1A5A405B; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:21:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c6ac47cc-293c-11b2-a85c-d421c8e4747b.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.171.92.56]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:21:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Pierre Morel To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, wintera@linux.ibm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, scgl@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v11 0/3] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:25:56 +0200 Message-Id: <20220701162559.158313-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ujwOps1zlbTh9F_-7fqSnL2r-L9b7NZf X-Proofpoint-GUID: YH8DiWdOt9YmuVqFQis_W81u6RaUSG_m X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-07-01_08,2022-06-28_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2207010065 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, This new spin suppress the check for real cpu migration and modify the checking of valid function code inside the interception of the STSI instruction. The series provides: 0- Modification of the ipte lock handling to use KVM instead of the vcpu as an argument because ipte lock work on SCA which is uniq per KVM structure and common to all vCPUs. 1- interception of the STSI instruction forwarding the CPU topology 2- interpretation of the PTF instruction 3- a KVM capability for the userland hypervisor to ask KVM to setup PTF interpretation. 4- KVM ioctl to get and set the MTCR bit of the SCA in order to migrate this bit during a migration. 0- Foreword The S390 CPU topology is reported using two instructions: - PTF, to get information if the CPU topology did change since last PTF instruction or a subsystem reset. - STSI, to get the topology information, consisting of the topology of the CPU inside the sockets, of the sockets inside the books etc. The PTF(2) instruction report a change if the STSI(15.1.2) instruction will report a difference with the last STSI(15.1.2) instruction*. With the SIE interpretation, the PTF(2) instruction will report a change to the guest if the host sets the SCA.MTCR bit. *The STSI(15.1.2) instruction reports: - The cores address within a socket - The polarization of the cores - The CPU type of the cores - If the cores are dedicated or not We decided to implement the CPU topology for S390 in several steps: - first we report CPU hotplug In future development we will provide: - modification of the CPU mask inside sockets - handling of shared CPUs - reporting of the CPU Type - reporting of the polarization 1- Interception of STSI To provide Topology information to the guest through the STSI instruction, we forward STSI with Function Code 15 to the userland hypervisor which will take care to provide the right information to the guest. To let the guest use both the PTF instruction to check if a topology change occurred and sthe STSI_15.x.x instruction we add a new KVM capability to enable the topology facility. 2- Interpretation of PTF with FC(2) The PTF instruction reports a topology change if there is any change with a previous STSI(15.1.2) SYSIB. Changes inside a STSI(15.1.2) SYSIB occur if CPU bits are set or clear inside the CPU Topology List Entry CPU mask field, which happens with changes in CPU polarization, dedication, CPU types and adding or removing CPUs in a socket. Considering that the KVM guests currently only supports: - horizontal polarization - type 3 (Linux) CPU And that we decide to support only: - dedicated CPUs on the host - pinned vCPUs on the guest the creation of vCPU will is the only trigger to set the MTCR bit for a guest. The reporting to the guest is done using the Multiprocessor Topology-Change-Report (MTCR) bit of the utility entry of the guest's SCA which will be cleared during the interpretation of PTF. Regards, Pierre Pierre Morel (3): KVM: s390: Cleanup ipte lock access and SIIF facility checks KVM: s390: guest support for topology function KVM: s390: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 25 +++++++++ arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 18 +++++- arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 10 ++++ arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++---------------- arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h | 6 +- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 22 +++++--- arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 8 +++ include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 + 9 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1 Changelog: from v10 to v11 - access mctr with interlocked access instead of ipte_lock (Janis) - set mctr in kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy (Nico) - better function documentation (Claudio) - use a single function to set and clear (Janosch) - Use u8 as API data (David, Janis) - Check KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI before returning data to userspace (Nico) from v9 to v10 - Suppression of the check on real CPU migration (Christian) - Changed the check on fc in handle_stsi (David) from v8 to v9 - bug correction in kvm_s390_topology_changed (Heiko) - simplification for ipte_lock/unlock to use kvm as arg instead of vcpu and test on sclp.has_siif instead of the SIE ECA_SII. (David) - use of a single value for reporting if the topology changed instead of a structure (David) from v7 to v8 - implement reset handling (Janosch) - change the way to check if the topology changed (Nico, Heiko) from v6 to v7 - rebase from v5 to v6 - make the subject more accurate (Claudio) - Change the kvm_s390_set_mtcr() function to have vcpu in the name (Janosch) - Replace the checks on ECB_PTF wit the check of facility 11 (Janosch) - modify kvm_arch_vcpu_load, move the check in a function in the header file (Janosh) - No magical number replace the "new cpu value" of -1 with a define (Janosch) - Make the checks for STSI validity clearer (Janosch) from v4 tp v5 - modify the way KVM_CAP is tested to be OK with vsie (David) from v3 to v4 - squatch both patches (David) - Added Documentation (David) - Modified the detection for new vCPUs (Pierre) from v2 to v3 - use PTF interpretation (Christian) - optimize arch_update_cpu_topology using PTF (Pierre) from v1 to v2: - Add a KVM capability to let QEMU know we support PTF and STSI 15 (David) - check KVM facility 11 before accepting STSI fc 15 (David) - handle all we can in userland (David) - add tracing to STSI fc 15 (Connie)