Received: by 2002:ac0:cd04:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp318459imn; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:07:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v6oWPi/1J7ghE750OSLXF+PcjYoTL7bHztu75G99LuRTn/XXvhCSuhNwBpGgxNkMYoFAKo X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:120c:b0:167:8847:21f2 with SMTP id l12-20020a170903120c00b00167884721f2mr21942457plh.11.1656716839844; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656716839; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QXBpbmSdq67qWNEGkaFDdYdfVRMGc/6gN3S81tgeILTlF9m0LvQHuzwLSbBeoekivf PZ9k03Mg5OzfM0/sFO1ltsdtxFvmhj0Tj8dhbXRUbk7QqqKY2VEN3LchgrXu1eyEyJ4D a/OV/xJswrXR5Nh8rQHWD7ZWJ6hxcpApH8tk7TuEoQU5R8BjmqS4mbykQ/X5eVPCE6vm bjn8czdoV97rLZjCrYG3rjdaoDrvaosQTTTvNmY6i76KCnakspNu1YPooIwFeVULGOGr 474IllTaenlOHPara1gKFKIEsfSGXIwcgtNYI/V36Mme4MDFv6C/JeVfhTfNASctpP1Q mMVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=bz5B0xsxU+73iD4WjJyZEms/7rCOpLm3Hnpz65WzTXY=; b=bG73Sh4U9uRx573l1Mz3PrTDe0FYmhb+nXa0gJ/7sXZ2UZK69MMVGQzpudbL2HAdAo D0bo/jjlFUWE66lAYU6ywp1GXPRtp7LX9VqADsVtbKkF2papZedYtn2hJ2jStfWyq6S/ 31X/489JptYjvVKea3AEmOwKiLnyjg4Dw0i+as+sCbQ/RT3nBAQ/bhT91C6FAqRO3IoL DCzxoY1jiX1lAo+dya8WvV/s4GkN9pdlEX8BOHSw4LDSToqcH7hbDAN9wQbROkoeitM4 4GuOD51sEruW2RCvYDu7fnVASDu8ILkBMQFho6NtVVct0aZ9Tb6KyBs/kbaZDfWZx9NC CRFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ATTARdUK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p18-20020a634f52000000b0040df7373a07si5402047pgl.235.2022.07.01.16.07.06; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ATTARdUK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232013AbiGAWzB (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:55:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50646 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231148AbiGAWy7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:54:59 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc36.google.com (mail-oo1-xc36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728AF59257 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc36.google.com with SMTP id h12-20020a4aa28c000000b00425ab778155so699572ool.2 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 15:54:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bz5B0xsxU+73iD4WjJyZEms/7rCOpLm3Hnpz65WzTXY=; b=ATTARdUKy47egfufdbPyC4D2FJ1yXf4Z9lgFfNQ4uvQ1T8so6MofoXks0BBs5rKNGN m5W+k7TApJtPQXqpSD+a8ab8ki0bRZS8VuoY7l180mH4coRCcTYJtqM18ANqlvlo47UQ efTQYG0DmiOG8CZOE21WPNz/c59IYjBKiIAfmFX2WPCZgbyIUZQfOQJkQ9/tALy6sME+ X+6je9912kHi2LM/W3lJFbjJ/5bzLKpBJFuANDGW2VUCEQXOGeJa7yo2T6jXOjBMAzfB lyNF/lmw+MTjdxDc5MLJ/ip5hZ8diBuEm4sGgqXb3CRmrCYX24cIqT/46M+1C390DFHs pW4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bz5B0xsxU+73iD4WjJyZEms/7rCOpLm3Hnpz65WzTXY=; b=7b0rJ5v3SXg2fbK1tx5IwSNR71FI9gk61Bm6ntYcFqIRZj0KnOZah9L47JEpYIV9eo M5qtVJD+3g7fMHSxQEg3uOfoUUWJgmqwek1q7OC03RyqUkL0Bm8KLgHip7Z3aQbvYgGm OFNGNvLO50C3xihvIkMLC6qoMbwFY4kGx4i4KoiTPLKCAuvBPI/wP4QTD9s2uqy0+KRz iN/0JuFXiW/p83LWZ5RiBLWwjSDYuUP986VOmN6nNaiSvOX4wIVifVqxYdNoDpdBkuWS NPryMLk2FfkEuOmDe5T/kYIgm4S8MZ8fomQRauaO3S/RMgw41ZdlgIUP5u0olo1/WKa5 w+Ng== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+WfCpKuTau7SE0bkcXyENYPnevW/ywhkRwbiOr5ZzIXtw+UvKm dAAzi72/X6kB9bkHEExj2SwtK4r+9prP6QTi5M4/eOcmwv5lug== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:e82b:0:b0:330:cee9:4a8a with SMTP id d11-20020a4ae82b000000b00330cee94a8amr7127923ood.31.1656716097462; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 15:54:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220629150625.238286-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20220629150625.238286-25-vkuznets@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20220629150625.238286-25-vkuznets@redhat.com> From: Jim Mattson Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:54:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 24/28] KVM: nVMX: Use sanitized allowed-1 bits for VMX control MSRs To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Anirudh Rayabharam , Wanpeng Li , Maxim Levitsky , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:07 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Using raw host MSR values for setting up nested VMX control MSRs is > incorrect as some features need to disabled, e.g. when KVM runs as > a nested hypervisor on Hyper-V and uses Enlightened VMCS or when a > workaround for IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL is applied. For non-nested VMX, this > is done in setup_vmcs_config() and the result is stored in vmcs_config. > Use it for setting up allowed-1 bits in nested VMX MSRs too. > > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------ > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h | 2 +- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 5 ++--- > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c > index 88625965f7b7..e5b19b5e6cab 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c > @@ -6565,8 +6565,13 @@ static u64 nested_vmx_calc_vmcs_enum_msr(void) > * bit in the high half is on if the corresponding bit in the control field > * may be on. See also vmx_control_verify(). > */ > -void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps) > +void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf, u32 ept_caps) > { > + struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs = &vmcs_conf->nested; > + > + /* Take the allowed-1 bits from KVM's sanitized VMCS configuration. */ > + u32 ignore_high; > + Giving this object a name seems gauche. > /* > * Note that as a general rule, the high half of the MSRs (bits in > * the control fields which may be 1) should be initialized by the > @@ -6583,11 +6588,11 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps) > */ > > /* pin-based controls */ > - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS, > - msrs->pinbased_ctls_low, > - msrs->pinbased_ctls_high); > + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS, msrs->pinbased_ctls_low, ignore_high); Perhaps "(u32){0}" rather than "ignore_high"? > msrs->pinbased_ctls_low |= > PIN_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR; NYC, but why is this one '|=', and the rest just '='? Does there exist a CPU that requires more than PIN_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR? > + > + msrs->pinbased_ctls_high = vmcs_conf->pin_based_exec_ctrl; > msrs->pinbased_ctls_high &= > PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK | > PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING | > @@ -6598,12 +6603,10 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps) > PIN_BASED_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER; > > /* exit controls */ > - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS, > - msrs->exit_ctls_low, > - msrs->exit_ctls_high); > msrs->exit_ctls_low = > VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR; > > + msrs->exit_ctls_high = vmcs_conf->vmexit_ctrl; > msrs->exit_ctls_high &= > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE | > @@ -6619,11 +6622,10 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps) > msrs->exit_ctls_low &= ~VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS; > > /* entry controls */ > - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS, > - msrs->entry_ctls_low, > - msrs->entry_ctls_high); > msrs->entry_ctls_low = > VM_ENTRY_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR; > + > + msrs->entry_ctls_high = vmcs_conf->vmentry_ctrl; > msrs->entry_ctls_high &= > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE | > @@ -6637,11 +6639,10 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps) > msrs->entry_ctls_low &= ~VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS; > > /* cpu-based controls */ > - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS, > - msrs->procbased_ctls_low, > - msrs->procbased_ctls_high); > msrs->procbased_ctls_low = > CPU_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR; > + > + msrs->procbased_ctls_high = vmcs_conf->cpu_based_exec_ctrl; > msrs->procbased_ctls_high &= > CPU_BASED_INTR_WINDOW_EXITING | > CPU_BASED_NMI_WINDOW_EXITING | CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETTING | > @@ -6675,12 +6676,9 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps) > * depend on CPUID bits, they are added later by > * vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid. > */ > - if (msrs->procbased_ctls_high & CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS) > - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2, > - msrs->secondary_ctls_low, > - msrs->secondary_ctls_high); > - > msrs->secondary_ctls_low = 0; > + > + msrs->secondary_ctls_high = vmcs_conf->cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl; > msrs->secondary_ctls_high &= > SECONDARY_EXEC_DESC | > SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_RDTSCP | > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h > index c92cea0b8ccc..fae047c6204b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ enum nvmx_vmentry_status { > }; > > void vmx_leave_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > -void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps); > +void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf, u32 ept_caps); > void nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup(void); > __init int nested_vmx_hardware_setup(int (*exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *)); > void nested_vmx_set_vmcs_shadowing_bitmap(void); > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > index 5f7ef1f8d2c6..5d4158b7421c 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -7310,7 +7310,7 @@ static int __init vmx_check_processor_compat(void) > if (setup_vmcs_config(&vmcs_conf, &vmx_cap) < 0) > return -EIO; > if (nested) > - nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(&vmcs_conf.nested, vmx_cap.ept); > + nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(&vmcs_conf, vmx_cap.ept); > if (memcmp(&vmcs_config, &vmcs_conf, sizeof(struct vmcs_config)) != 0) { > printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: CPU %d feature inconsistency!\n", > smp_processor_id()); > @@ -8285,8 +8285,7 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void) > setup_default_sgx_lepubkeyhash(); > > if (nested) { > - nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(&vmcs_config.nested, > - vmx_capability.ept); > + nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(&vmcs_config, vmx_capability.ept); > > r = nested_vmx_hardware_setup(kvm_vmx_exit_handlers); > if (r) > -- > 2.35.3 >