Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:11:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:11:24 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:13049 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:10:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:10:17 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: willy tarreau Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please tag tested releases of the 2.4.x kernel Message-ID: <20011130171017.L504@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: willy tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011201010521.31804.qmail@web20504.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011201010521.31804.qmail@web20504.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 02:05:21AM +0100, willy tarreau wrote: > I think that if even one tenth of the LKML > subscribers rank their kernels at least once a week, > we'll quickly see some stable and unusable kernels. > I like this idea a lot. Who can get such a system up and running? Which web site? mf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/